ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

stalenhag · 8 February 2009, 01:12 AM

Went to my local AD today and tried on the Sub Date, Sub ND Cosc, Sub LV and finally the new WG Blue Sub...

I am currently saving for a Sub, but havn't decided which one to go for, the Sub ND COSC is growing on me.

When I tried them, the Sub ND felt a bit flatter on the wrist compared to the Sub Date - is the Sub Date a bit thicker or is it just me?

Oh, the new sub was impressive with the new clasp and maxi dial, with the blueish glow...

yannis · 8 February 2009, 01:14 AM

Maybe it is the cyclops over the date that gives a feeling the Submariner 16610 has a thicker glass?

gettocard · 8 February 2009, 01:17 AM

all of them are stunning pieces.

Talking about the new WG one,we're on a totally differente planet. I'm not talking about prices only...it is really a stunning watch.

Yes,the ND Sub has a flatter case and lug holes aswell.

stalenhag · 8 February 2009, 01:19 AM

Maybe, the dealer said that the case on the Sub-date was a bit thicker in order to make room for the date complication. I always thought that they share the same case but have a bit different oyster bands (non-SEL vs. SEL)

Trurolexer · 8 February 2009, 01:20 AM

Nice avatar...

stalenhag · 8 February 2009, 01:21 AM

Agree on the WG Sub, it felt more like the GMT IIc than the ordinary sub. I asked if she knew when the black SS version is coming, but she didn't know

stalenhag · 8 February 2009, 01:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trurolexer

Nice avatar...

U got to love old J.R

8 February 2009, 01:12 AM	#1
stalenhag "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: planet earth Posts: 243	submariner orgy... Went to my local AD today and tried on the Sub Date, Sub ND Cosc, Sub LV and finally the new WG Blue Sub... I am currently saving for a Sub, but havn't decided which one to go for, the Sub ND COSC is growing on me. When I tried them, the Sub ND felt a bit flatter on the wrist compared to the Sub Date - is the Sub Date a bit thicker or is it just me? Oh, the new sub was impressive with the new clasp and maxi dial, with the blueish glow...

8 February 2009, 01:14 AM	#2
yannis "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Real Name: Yannis Location: Europe Watch: maniac Posts: 9,070	Maybe it is the cyclops over the date that gives a feeling the Submariner 16610 has a thicker glass? __________________ Rolex Submariner 116610LV \| Tudor 79220N DSSD MEMBERS - OWNERS CLUB

8 February 2009, 01:17 AM	#3
gettocard Banned Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Andy Location: EU Watch: them come and go.. Posts: 2,052	all of them are stunning pieces. Talking about the new WG one,we're on a totally differente planet. I'm not talking about prices only...it is really a stunning watch. Yes,the ND Sub has a flatter case and lug holes aswell.

8 February 2009, 01:19 AM	#4
stalenhag "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: planet earth Posts: 243	Maybe, the dealer said that the case on the Sub-date was a bit thicker in order to make room for the date complication. I always thought that they share the same case but have a bit different oyster bands (non-SEL vs. SEL)

8 February 2009, 01:20 AM	#5
Trurolexer Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: USA Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex Posts: 18,421	Nice avatar...

8 February 2009, 01:21 AM	#6
stalenhag "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: planet earth Posts: 243	Agree on the WG Sub, it felt more like the GMT IIc than the ordinary sub. I asked if she knew when the black SS version is coming, but she didn't know

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)