ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
11 June 2019, 09:49 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 325
|
Submariner help
Hello, I had an older Sub, 14060, and stupidly sold it a few years ago. As you can imagine I deeply regret it now. Fortunately, I have the option of purchasing a new Sub, 114060, in the near future. My question is has anyone had a look at the new Sub? How does it compare in size to the older model. I have a very small wrist and I'm a little worried about it being to large. My wrist measures about 6.5 inches.
Thank you all for your opinion and assistance. |
11 June 2019, 09:52 AM | #2 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 3,410
|
Quote:
|
|
11 June 2019, 09:54 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: YVR
Posts: 28
|
The 14060 definitely wears smaller, but the 114060 is suitable for a 6.5 inches wrist
|
11 June 2019, 10:01 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: New Zealand
Watch: 114060
Posts: 2,630
|
The current one is much better, in pretty much every way, unless of course you dislike the way the new one looks. The bracelet of the 114060 is great.
|
11 June 2019, 10:11 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
|
I think you'd be fine to pull off a 114060. They do wear noticeably larger though.
|
11 June 2019, 10:16 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: United States
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 287
|
I have a 6.25 inch wrist, have a 116610 (same size), no concerns at all, gets compliments all the time. Pull the trigger quick before it's gone ;)
__________________
Current collection: 116610 LN, 126710 BLNR, JLC Master Geographic, Breitling SO A17364, Omega Seamaster 1951 cal. 351, Movado circa 1950's Up next: 116500 (white dial) Grails: PP 5205G, PP 5712, PP 5230, Daytona 116519 |
11 June 2019, 10:33 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
It all depends on your wrist shape.
Try one on...and buy it if you like the way it looks. |
11 June 2019, 12:04 PM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: New York
Posts: 370
|
Your being pedantic
|
11 June 2019, 12:53 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Scott
Location: Santa Cruz
Watch: RolexOmegaPanerai
Posts: 1,182
|
14060
14060 I would think would fit a 6.5 wrist better. Unless you like the larger watches.
|
11 June 2019, 12:58 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: DC
Watch: 126710BLRO, 116600
Posts: 7,869
|
After having a 14060 I would think the biggest adjustment for you would be the maxi case, specifically the bloated lugs on the 114060.
|
11 June 2019, 01:51 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: US
Watch: sub
Posts: 2,427
|
Definitely try it before you buy. I did and went with a 14060. There are some things that are great about the newer model. Bracelet feels like a solid piece of steel that bends; hard to explain. Clasp is great with glidelock but kind of chunky.
In the end I just didn't like the shininess of the ceramic bezel and the blockiness of the case. I do like the larger indices and hands. |
11 June 2019, 03:13 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: N California
Posts: 909
|
I wear a 114060 on my 6.25 inch wrist and think it looks fine. I used to own the 116610 in my avatar but now prefer the cleaner look of the 114060. Nobody else seems to care what watch I wear.
|
11 June 2019, 04:04 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Dom
Location: London
Posts: 263
|
You really need to try it on. The super case makes the 6 digit sub feel like a completely different watch on the wrist compared to the 5 digit.
I have 6.75inch wrists and I had the 116610 and 116613, but in the end, couldn't live with the lugs which made the watch feel too blocky on my wrist. Eventually sold them both for a 16610, which I think is much better proportioned for my wrist. |
11 June 2019, 06:36 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ByDawns Earlylite
Watch: 16800
Posts: 3,580
|
My wrist is right at 7" I pick my DJ36 every time over my 16800 based on comfort and classic looks. Honestly, I think a 40mm is too big for a 6.5 wrist for everyday wear. If you are involved in water activities on a regular basis I might give the nod to the Sub, otherwise consider a smaller, thinner, lighter, less bulky watch.
|
11 June 2019, 08:17 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Poland
Watch: 16610
Posts: 341
|
Definitely you have to try it before you pull the trigger. I have 7" wrist and couldn't convince myself to 6-digit Subs. It really wears much more like 42 than 40 mm. You have convenient glidelock adjustment but clasp itself takes 70% of my wrist width and makes it uncomfortable even when fitted perfectly. Also blingy bezel and maxi indices increase wrist presence. I wanted to buy 6-digit Sub because it's much more reasonable purchase with 5-year warranty but ended up with 5-digit because it's much more aesthetically pleasing and comfortable for everyday wear.
|
11 June 2019, 11:55 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Watch: EXP/SUB
Posts: 150
|
6” wrists here and my 114060 fits great, more comfortable than my explorer actually. You’ll be fine.
|
12 June 2019, 01:30 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: UK
Watch: my angry dog
Posts: 179
|
You can't lose (perhaps unless you're buying grey/used). Buy, try, and if necessary sell for what you paid - there's no shortage of buyers for a new Submariner!
|
12 June 2019, 04:04 AM | #18 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,738
|
The 6 digit Submariner does not wear big at all, perhaps quite the contrary by todays standards.
With your wrist size no problem
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.