The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 August 2019, 09:59 PM   #1
savoytruffle
"TRF" Member
 
savoytruffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UK
Watch: Explorer 214270
Posts: 36
Changing Explorer 214270 for Sub 114060

So the no date Sub has been calling me for a while now.

I still look down at the Explorer on my wrist and admire it. I still love the timeless nature of it and part of me will miss it a lot. But part of me is craving something with a bit more heft and visual impact. I chose the Explorer over the Sub seven years ago but think that now's the time for a change.

Has anyone done similar?

Thoughts?

Will I regret this?!

For reference, wrist is 7 inches and suits both watches.

savoytruffle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2019, 10:18 PM   #2
MichaelT123
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 54
I had the 214270 Explorer and added the 114060 Sub. These are my only 2 luxury watches, and I absolutely love both. Therefore, adding the Sub would be my recommendation even if you have to wait as I do think you would miss the Explorer. However, if that is not possible, I don't think you will be at all disappointed by the Sub. In fact, I think you will love it - but you will likely miss the Explorer and regret selling it.
MichaelT123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2019, 10:41 PM   #3
Maverick_1908
"TRF" Member
 
Maverick_1908's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: México
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 544
Two different watches. Sub is more sporty and thicker. Explorer is more versatile.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maverick_1908 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2019, 10:45 PM   #4
Catatafish
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Catatafish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Todd
Location: Memphis, TN USA
Watch: Sub 126610LV
Posts: 209
The sub will be just as timeless to look at over the years and has a useful fidget spinner/egg timer on it, and even a date if you go that route. If I ran across one it would be a no brainer for me.
Catatafish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2019, 10:47 PM   #5
mg Barcelona
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 298
I had both but I could never get used to the maxi case. Loved the dial, bezel and bracelet but the case just didn't have the design balance for me. I still have the 214270 Mk 2 and I swapped the SubC for a 5 digit.
mg Barcelona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2019, 10:54 PM   #6
Brny11
"TRF" Member
 
Brny11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Real Name: Brian
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,460
So I went from 114060 to a 214270. Something was missing with the 114060 that I thought Exp could fill. It did not. I eventually traded the 214270 for 116610ln and for 3 years I have never been more in love with a watch. Had a chance back then for any watch of my choosing, BLNR, GMT LN, Hulk, etc. I chose SubC date and would do so in today’s market as well.

I get that many like 114060 on this forum, but in reality, I personally find the date much more complete and interesting (and useful). If you are going to swap, I’d strongly recommend going this route.

In regards to flipping Exp for Sub (any variation), it is a no brainer to me. Both are Subtle, but Sub has more wrist presence for the owner (both fly under radar in public). The bezel makes all the difference in the world. Together, Exp and sub make a near perfect 1,2 punch, but if that’s not possible (as it wasn’t for me at the time), swap for the Sub and never look back!

Of course, this is just one WIS perspective!

Good luck!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Brny11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2019, 12:31 AM   #7
British-GT
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 95
I have cycled through all sports models over a 30 year period and the one that sits on my wrist now is the 214270, I don’t like have multiple watches so as a one only watch it’s perfect, it goes to the gym, running, cycling, traveling, business and just about everythingelse, stays on my wrist at night just never comes off!! For me the perfect one only wristwatch.
British-GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2019, 12:44 AM   #8
twowheels
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: portland, OR
Posts: 42
Both great watches, pick the one that makes you happy. I've got black dial 216570 and 114060 and love them both.
twowheels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2019, 12:47 AM   #9
Jmbarrack
"TRF" Member
 
Jmbarrack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: United States
Watch: Ever changing!
Posts: 1,150
You may prefer the way a 14060 fits over a 114060. The overall dimensions of the 214170 are closer to the 5 digit sub than to the 6 digit. Make sure you try them both on.
Jmbarrack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2019, 02:15 AM   #10
Art 1
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
I did that same thing and did not have any regrets.
Art 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2019, 02:19 AM   #11
Ravager135
"TRF" Member
 
Ravager135's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,222
I've had both. I sold the 114060 a while back and ended up getting a 116610LV for more contrast. Obviously, get what you love most. A more technical answer would depend on what else you have in your collection. I think a white dial Explorer II makes perfect sense if you already own multiple no date black dial watches. If this will be your only Rolex reference, then I think the 114060 is a perfect choice as it is so emblematic of the brand.
Ravager135 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2019, 02:28 AM   #12
pikers
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: New England
Posts: 248
I had the 214270 (swapped it for the 114270) and now have the 114060. While they are both sports watches, they are very different watches. The 214270 has a case similar to the datejusts which is more curved and fluid compared to the maxi case subs which are broad and slab sided. I found that the 214270 sits much better on my flat 6.5" wrist vs the sub. The sub does fit (just barely) but it sits higher than the Explorer due to the case back. If I had to pick one (gun to my head), it would be tough but I'd probably go with the Explorer. It's just more my style and I love the 3-6-9 dial. If you can swing both, I would do it. Great two watch setup.
pikers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2019, 02:36 AM   #13
NoVaSubowner
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Alexandria, VA
Watch: Love them.
Posts: 1,095
Question is, do you have ready access to one from an AD? Otherwise you are forced to pay grey market prices.

My guess is that you are looking at 2000-3000 cash out of pocket after selling the Expl. Not worth it in my mind, unless of course the itch won't go away.
NoVaSubowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2019, 02:40 AM   #14
Ricky Rolex
"TRF" Member
 
Ricky Rolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: London
Watch: Various
Posts: 1,214
Have had both and wear the Explorer pretty much every day. I just find it less common here in London.

A lot of my friends have Subs and I like the Explorer more for its sleek yet un fussed design.

Both beautiful watches but I don't wear mine to be seen. I get the impression from your wording that you want to be noticed a little more. Apologies if I'm wrong.
__________________
Have previously owned & own

♛GMT II Coke 16710♛ ♛DateJust 16030♛ ♛Explorer 214270 mk2♛ Submariner 116610LN♛ 126711CHNR ♛
Ricky Rolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2019, 02:43 AM   #15
1mlee0916
"TRF" Member
 
1mlee0916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: N/A
Posts: 183
Changing Explorer 214270 for Sub 114060

Try it on first if you can from a grey. Had both, sold the Sub. As much as the glidelock is praised, it was just too long to be comfortable on my wrist. The heft of the sub was also considerably more. Love my Explorer. Will never let it go.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1mlee0916 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2019, 02:43 AM   #16
JSL420
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Asia
Watch: Explorer 214270
Posts: 149
why not go for 16600 or 116600 sea dweller?
The case is slimmer than the sub and you get a lot of a watch for the money
JSL420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2019, 03:24 AM   #17
savoytruffle
"TRF" Member
 
savoytruffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UK
Watch: Explorer 214270
Posts: 36
Thanks for the replies so far everyone. One of the reasons I'm looking to change is that I've been wearing the Explorer with a T Shirt a lot recently and it doesn't look that substantial on my wrist. It's not as much of an issue with a cuff.

It isn't necessarily that I want to be noticed more, I just want something that fills the wrist space a bit more and has more presence. We talk about the versatility of the Explorer a lot and it's one of the main reasons I picked it up in the first place. So I suppose the question has to be when does the Sub not fit? What job is the Explorer doing that the Sub couldn't?

I'm fishing around for AD availability as I know a few people have managed to pick Subs up with only a couple of months wait. If I do get the Sub, the Explorer has to go. I'm not fortunate enough to have two at the moment. Maybe in the future!
savoytruffle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2019, 03:30 AM   #18
Maverick_1908
"TRF" Member
 
Maverick_1908's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: México
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 544
Quote:
Originally Posted by savoytruffle View Post
Thanks for the replies so far everyone. One of the reasons I'm looking to change is that I've been wearing the Explorer with a T Shirt a lot recently and it doesn't look that substantial on my wrist. It's not as much of an issue with a cuff.

It isn't necessarily that I want to be noticed more, I just want something that fills the wrist space a bit more and has more presence. We talk about the versatility of the Explorer a lot and it's one of the main reasons I picked it up in the first place. So I suppose the question has to be when does the Sub not fit? What job is the Explorer doing that the Sub couldn't?

I'm fishing around for AD availability as I know a few people have managed to pick Subs up with only a couple of months wait. I do get the Sub, the Explorer has to go. Not fortunate enough to have two at the moment. Maybe in the future!

Submariner can do everything, dress up or down. No question. The Explorer is just more comfortable objectively. Doesn’t mean the Sub is not comfortable, it absolutely is.

Do you have a wrist shot with your Explorer?

Is the 3k difference worth it to you for the switch to a Sub?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maverick_1908 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2019, 03:36 AM   #19
Chewbacca
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
Nothing wrong with changing it up.

But also consider keeping the EXP39 and getting a used Pelagos blue on rubber. Or even a BB red or blue. I find the Pelagos line in particular to be a great short sleeve sporty fun watch.

Don't forget you'll need to add about $2-$3k to make a deal anyway so two R/T's in the stable are always better than one.

Chewbacca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2019, 03:43 AM   #20
savoytruffle
"TRF" Member
 
savoytruffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UK
Watch: Explorer 214270
Posts: 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSL420 View Post
why not go for 16600 or 116600 sea dweller?
The case is slimmer than the sub and you get a lot of a watch for the money
Nice watches but out of my price range on the secondary market!
savoytruffle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2019, 03:55 AM   #21
JDR888
"TRF" Member
 
JDR888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: UK
Watch: Rolex 214270
Posts: 271
Quote:
Originally Posted by savoytruffle View Post
Thanks for the replies so far everyone. One of the reasons I'm looking to change is that I've been wearing the Explorer with a T Shirt a lot recently and it doesn't look that substantial on my wrist. It's not as much of an issue with a cuff.

It isn't necessarily that I want to be noticed more, I just want something that fills the wrist space a bit more and has more presence. We talk about the versatility of the Explorer a lot and it's one of the main reasons I picked it up in the first place. So I suppose the question has to be when does the Sub not fit? What job is the Explorer doing that the Sub couldn't?

I'm fishing around for AD availability as I know a few people have managed to pick Subs up with only a couple of months wait. If I do get the Sub, the Explorer has to go. I'm not fortunate enough to have two at the moment. Maybe in the future!
I have both but if I had to go down to one watch, I’d keep the Explorer. IMO it’s a better balanced all-rounder for most situations along with the benefit of better wearability.

If you bin the Explorer you’ll regret it so don’t scratch an (impatient and unnecessary) itch that’s not really there, save for your Sub and run with the perfect combo.
__________________
Loved and sold: 14060, Breitling Super Avenger, PAM000, PAM005, IWC3536, 116710LN, Tudor Pelagos, Tudor Black Bay Blue, 16600, 114060 & 126333.

Current stable: 214270, 126234, 126710BLRO & Pelagos 39mm
JDR888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2019, 04:06 AM   #22
radicalchic
"TRF" Member
 
radicalchic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Italy
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdr888 View Post
if you bin the explorer you’ll regret it so don’t scratch an (impatient and unnecessary) itch that’s not really there, save for your sub and run with the perfect combo.
+1
radicalchic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2019, 04:40 AM   #23
savoytruffle
"TRF" Member
 
savoytruffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UK
Watch: Explorer 214270
Posts: 36
Some wrist shots for those who have asked.

Do you think this wrist needs a Sub?






savoytruffle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2019, 02:48 PM   #24
AlTampa
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Albert
Location: Tampa, FL USA
Watch: 216570 Polar
Posts: 3
I have a 114060 barely used, card dated 9/18/2019. I also have a 216570 Polar dial. So I am considering selling/trading the 114060 for a 214270 mk2. Let me know if your interested.
AlTampa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2019, 03:04 PM   #25
robbyrolex
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 203
opposite

I traded my 16610 in for a 214270 2 years ago.
I prefer the Exp.
robbyrolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2019, 01:01 AM   #26
Finslayer83
"TRF" Member
 
Finslayer83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Tennessee
Watch: DW-5600
Posts: 1,584
I've had the 14060M and the 214270 at the same time.

Now have the 214270 and a 16610, both with slight mods.

If you like the comfort of the 214270 I'd strongly suggest the 5 digit Sub models as they wear more or less the same.

Nothing like the 6 digit subs.
Finslayer83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.