ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 September 2019, 06:44 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Turkey
Posts: 24
|
Need help for a potential 5513 purchase
|
19 September 2019, 07:57 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,981
|
Hard to tell for sure because there's so much glare on the photos. I can tell you that the insert pearl is way too big and shouldn't have a metal surround. What is the beginning of the serial number?
I'd suggest getting clearer photos in natural light. What are your concerns exactly? |
19 September 2019, 08:00 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,252
|
Yeah, I think the insert is for a 5-digit reference. Something I learned recently myself. The dial and hands look nice in those photos. Serial and inside-caseback photos?
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
19 September 2019, 08:03 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Turkey
Posts: 24
|
From the serial, I can say that it is made in 1966. The seller states that it is all original. Prices vary alot on a vintae Rolex depending on the condition of the watch so I don't want to make a mistake.
|
19 September 2019, 08:09 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Turkey
Posts: 24
|
|
19 September 2019, 08:21 AM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,981
|
Well, it's not all original, as established above, so that's a red flag for starters.
|
19 September 2019, 08:44 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Turkey
Posts: 24
|
|
19 September 2019, 03:18 PM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,329
|
Not all original and obviously so; so seller is either misleading or doesn’t know what he’s talking about. I’d err on the side of cynicism.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
19 September 2019, 10:43 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Turkey
Posts: 24
|
I think there is another possibility that a bigger pearl was mounted by making a bigger hole on the bezel.
|
19 September 2019, 11:26 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Turkey
Posts: 24
|
Ok here is the story. Seller is a watchsmith. He told me that bezel is original and he mounted the pearl but without making a bigger hole on the bezel.
|
19 September 2019, 11:34 PM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,252
|
I don't know. Shouldn't a meters-first dial have a long-five insert?
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
20 September 2019, 02:21 AM | #12 |
TechXpert
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: London
Posts: 2,242
|
The case middle has a lot of pitting on the gasket mating surface. That is not good and can mean the waterproofness cannot be guaranteed anymore.
|
28 September 2019, 02:12 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Turkey
Posts: 24
|
Thanks for all the info. I think I will pass this one.
|
28 September 2019, 05:27 AM | #14 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Great State of TX
Posts: 5,761
|
How much is he asking for it?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Forty six & 2 are just ahead of me. Follow me on Instagram @ccrolex |
28 September 2019, 06:59 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: NYC
Posts: 263
|
I really hate that pearl. If he is a watchmaker and didn't immediately discuss or disclose that when you first talked about the sale it is a bit of a problem.
The rest of the condition of that insert isn't great. Case pitting isn't great. It all depends on price of course and depends on your goals / what you want.
__________________
Modern: 116610LV / 114300 / AP 15202ST / PP 5065A Vintage: 1016 - Gilt Chapter Ring Underline + Exclamation Point / 16618 - Black / 1803 Orange Stella Dial |
28 September 2019, 08:31 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Turkey
Posts: 24
|
|
28 September 2019, 08:32 AM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Turkey
Posts: 24
|
Quote:
|
|
28 September 2019, 03:24 PM | #18 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Great State of TX
Posts: 5,761
|
I wouldn’t let a fake pearl bother me too much. A lot of old school watchmakers didn’t/don’t care about such details. They replaced an item with something that fit if they didn’t have access to an original. Who would’ve thought an original pearl mattered to anyone?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Forty six & 2 are just ahead of me. Follow me on Instagram @ccrolex |
28 September 2019, 09:33 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: España
Posts: 179
|
I think right insert, but fake pearl
|
29 September 2019, 03:36 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Kevin
Location: N.S. Canada
Posts: 559
|
I like it. Fake pearl is easily fixed. I once saw a 5513 with a diamond instead of pearl haha.
|
29 September 2019, 06:24 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Turkey
Posts: 24
|
What do you think about the price given the situation? Too steep I guess.
|
29 September 2019, 06:35 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Stratosphere
Posts: 1,993
|
Fake pearl is correct, but also damaged the insert to "drill" it in. That to me effects the value.
I personally believe that in this market you can find significantly better for not MUCH higher. It's a nice watch, but I'd continue my hunt for a stronger example, that's just me. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.