The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19 October 2019, 12:56 AM   #1
Cloudchaser
"TRF" Member
 
Cloudchaser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Wild Wild West
Watch: Watching
Posts: 1,755
1655 Bracelet Choice

If you had to choose between a mint 93150 (from 2005) or a mint 78360 (from 2001) to put on a new (to you) 1978 1655, which would you choose?

The 78360 is the "correct" modern bracelet but the 93150 is comfortable and slightly more secure (given the clasp).

Thoughts? Thanks!
Cloudchaser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2019, 01:01 AM   #2
offrdmania
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
offrdmania's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,991
Adjustability and comfort is about the same IMO, they both have roughly the same amount of adjustment points in the clasp and if I recall, the inner clasp blades are the same. The only difference with a 93150 is that it has a flip lock and a full length outer clasp housing, the 78360 has a shorter clasp housing. The links themselves are exactly the same. So the parts that actually touch your wrist are no different.
You could argue that one has a divers extension and the other doesnt but unless you are diving, what does it matter?
__________________
TRF Member 11738
offrdmania is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2019, 01:54 AM   #3
Cloudchaser
"TRF" Member
 
Cloudchaser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Wild Wild West
Watch: Watching
Posts: 1,755
Quote:
Originally Posted by offrdmania View Post
Adjustability and comfort is about the same IMO, they both have roughly the same amount of adjustment points in the clasp and if I recall, the inner clasp blades are the same. The only difference with a 93150 is that it has a flip lock and a full length outer clasp housing, the 78360 has a shorter clasp housing. The links themselves are exactly the same. So the parts that actually touch your wrist are no different.
You could argue that one has a divers extension and the other doesnt but unless you are diving, what does it matter?
Thanks! I've put the 93150 on it for now but I think I'll switch over to the 78360 as the bracelet. Since, as you note, there shouldn't be a comfort difference, then it's probably best to opt for the "correct" one.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1655-wrist.jpg (171.7 KB, 140 views)
Cloudchaser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2019, 05:48 AM   #4
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,308
I would definitely go with a 78360 Oyster.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2019, 06:33 AM   #5
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by springer View Post
I would definitely go with a 78360 Oyster.
Agreed. It's more appropriate for a 1655, and I personally find it more comfortable anyway. I have a relatively small wrist, and the large clasp of the 93150 is a bit awkward.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2019, 12:53 AM   #6
218225
"TRF" Member
 
218225's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Netherlands
Watch: 1655+216570
Posts: 497
78360 for sure. Why would you want a diver extension?


Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk Pro
218225 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2019, 08:16 AM   #7
jdmi32
"TRF" Member
 
jdmi32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Ky
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: 16570
Posts: 2,362
78360 with 580 ends and you’re set.
jdmi32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2019, 08:35 AM   #8
1665fan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,659
Wow that’s an albino
1665fan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2019, 01:34 PM   #9
Cloudchaser
"TRF" Member
 
Cloudchaser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Wild Wild West
Watch: Watching
Posts: 1,755
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdmi32 View Post
78360 with 580 ends and you’re set.
It now has the proper bracelet and end links! Comfortable and, aside from having to get used to the smaller case (compared to modern), very stylish. I better understand the allure of this vintage!
Cloudchaser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2019, 01:39 PM   #10
Cloudchaser
"TRF" Member
 
Cloudchaser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Wild Wild West
Watch: Watching
Posts: 1,755
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1665fan View Post
Wow that’s an albino
Yes...which seems to divide fans like the name does. I like the white.
Cloudchaser is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.