ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
21 March 2009, 04:59 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 54
|
Which of these 3 gets your nod?
Hi everyone,
I'm going to be purchasing my first Omega shortly. The 3 left in contention are: 1) Seamaster 300 (black bezel and dial-model #2254.50-discontinued) 2) Seamaster 300 titanium (black dial-model #2231.50) 3) 42mm Planet Ocean (Black dial and bezel-model #2201.50) This watch will be my daily wearer. Personally, i like all 3 of the models, but thought i would ask for opinions from those with more experience and knowledge as to your recommendations regarding the pros and cons of each of these. Additionally, what type (% wise) discount should i be looking for off list on these models, and, do any of you have any AD's that you would strongly recommend and will ship out of state? Please feel free to send me a PM if you don't feel comfortable posting their contact info on here. Thanks for your help! |
21 March 2009, 06:03 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,185
|
Personally, I prefer SS to TI. SS is easier to maintain and has a heftier feel.
I love the PO but the case is too thick for me to wear comfortably. It will not slip easily under a shirt cuff. But if I could wear one, I would have one. A friend surprised me with the black SMP (2254.50) for Christmas a year ago and IMO, it is the perfect diver. It is a classic design with a solid movement and a go-anywhere, do-anything, wear-with-anything watch. Of the three you mention, ithe 2254.50 is about as perfect a daily wearer as one will find and for about a third the cost of a Sub. Now that it has been discontinued, new ones will not be around much longer. Check for a PM with an AD recommendation. Fr. John† |
21 March 2009, 06:40 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Watch: ama call it?
Posts: 288
|
My preference would be in the exact order you listed them. Get a 2254.50 while you still can. There's still time to pick up POs.
|
21 March 2009, 09:17 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: Air-King 114200
Posts: 2,878
|
the po is a bit on the chunky side for my tastes. titanium looks dull and has the heft of aluminum. so you know what my choice would be.
|
21 March 2009, 09:24 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
|
X2. My only addition would be that I would first try to find a BNIB or LNIB example via a private seller. I love Omega, but they depreciate sssooooo much right away it's kind of painful to buy from an AD (even w/ the inevitable discount you're sure to get). You can save probably 30-50% if you find the right example via a private seller. Good luck.
|
21 March 2009, 11:33 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Andy
Location: Kuala Lumpur, MY
Watch: Me Watching You!!
Posts: 3,260
|
i'm going for the PO.
|
21 March 2009, 11:43 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Russ
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 5,760
|
I would recommend the 2254.50 for a daily wearer. I bought mine new from an AD about 4 or 5 months ago. They can still be had new if you get lucky. I see them come up for sale alot, but I prefer to buy my watches new. Good Luck!
__________________
Russ |
22 March 2009, 12:09 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: UK
Posts: 7,023
|
2254.50
|
22 March 2009, 12:28 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Kevin
Location: USA
Watch: the skies
Posts: 1,250
|
Quote:
|
|
22 March 2009, 01:30 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 8
|
PO |
22 March 2009, 02:13 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 9
|
2254.50 is a great watch for a daily wear in my opinion..
|
22 March 2009, 03:56 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
|
Beautiful watch, but another thing to keep in mind w/ the PO is the double AR coating. I know from experience (prior PO Chrono owner) that the outer coating CAN get scratched. The crystal is bulletproof...but not that thin layer of film. Once you scratch it your watch crystal appears to be flawed. Plus, some do not like the slight blue hue that is given off by the coating. Personally, I didn't mind the hue and thought it looked kind of cool...but I couldn't get over that film scratching. If I would have kept the watch for a long time, I would have probably paid for a professional to remove the outer coating. Cheers.
|
22 March 2009, 06:59 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 2,776
|
Have you tried them?
Which fits your wrist best? Do you like a hefty watch? I'd love a PO, it's a great look, but it's just too big. 2254.50 would be the answer, but I'm a vintage kind of guy. |
22 March 2009, 09:24 AM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: massachusetts
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,691
|
i own the 2254 and PO
....the 2254 gets a lot of love but i think the PO is a better watch. i like the applied numerals, the revolutionary movement, more solid feeling bracelet. my PO is more accurate and has a longer power reserve.
finally, i think the PO looks better. the pronounced chapter ring b/w the bezel numbers and face, the matte black dial, and domed crystal ( 2254 has it but it's not as pronounced) make it more of a handsome and substantial watch. 2254 is a very fine watch. but the PO is better, especially if you like a heftier piece. my choices would be 1. PO 2. 2254 3. titanium 300 Quote:
|
|
22 March 2009, 12:16 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: mike
Location: Dallas, Tx
Watch: Rolex and AP
Posts: 1,087
|
2254
__________________
DD40 RG, DD40 Platinum, Submariner Bluesy, WG YM 42, YM 40 |
22 March 2009, 02:18 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Jus
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: 16610 LV
Posts: 17
|
2254.50.00 all the way
|
22 March 2009, 02:59 PM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: PNW
Watch: All of them
Posts: 326
|
Quote:
x2 If you get the 2254 you know you'll eventually want the PO. |
|
22 March 2009, 10:34 PM | #18 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,753
|
Po.
|
23 March 2009, 01:00 AM | #19 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 54
|
The jury is in and believe i'm going to go with the PO. After reading your posts and giving some thought, i eliminated the titanium Seamaster altogether as a contender. Had the chance yesterday to stop in an AD and look at the PO and Seamaster (not 2254.50) next to one another and compare. Definately two very different pieces although both are beautiful on their own merits. The PO seems to be the one that sings to me the most, i really like the substantial feel and heft. It's been a tough decision, but do believe i'll be attempting to pick up a PO shortly. Many thanks to all and will post some pictures when i pick up the new piece (hopefully shortly).
|
23 March 2009, 10:13 AM | #20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: massachusetts
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,691
|
make sure you post the pics! you made the right decision, i think. they're both great watches, but i think the PO is a step up. personally, it's my favorite watch ( i have a sub no date which i really like alot but my PO makes me smile the most).
Quote:
|
|
23 March 2009, 10:27 AM | #21 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 35
|
I've been trying to add a P.O. to my rotation
but I disagree it's a better watch than the 2254.... IMHO.. it's a different watch... gw |
23 March 2009, 10:45 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
|
|
23 March 2009, 12:14 PM | #23 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 54
|
Offhand, Does anyone know the height and weight of the 42 mm PO with bracelet?
|
23 March 2009, 08:59 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: ..
Watch: Rolex Explorer II
Posts: 1,820
|
Another vote for the 2254.50 from the group you listed. A great watch! I enjoy mine! Cheers, Bill P.
|
2 April 2009, 08:32 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: san francisco
Posts: 28
|
2254 it's a classic!
|
2 April 2009, 12:59 PM | #26 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Kevin
Location: PA, USA
Watch: Explorer & JLC MC
Posts: 77
|
Quote:
|
|
2 April 2009, 10:21 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Glasgow
Watch: 2220.80 Seamaster
Posts: 140
|
No brainer - 2254.50
The PO does nothing for me |
3 April 2009, 12:38 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 15
|
I would pick 2254.50.
Below is mine on the AC rubber strap: |
7 April 2009, 03:52 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: J
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Omega Seiko
Posts: 1,562
|
+1 for PO. Although 2254 is very nice. The PO represents the change in Omega, and is one of their greatest model to date.
I actually have the Bond (similar to 2254) which I bought around a month ago, and I thought I would be happy, but now I'm looking at the PO.. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.