![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Oregon
Posts: 115
|
$6-8k - Sub, Explorer or ?
Another “what to buy” thread I know
Looking to spend $6-8k, new or second hand. Mostly considering Explorer 1 39mm or a SubC 114060 (date is a bit too much $) Both have pros and cons. Question is, what would you buy? $6-8k in the market on a main piece, go anywhere watch? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: Danny
Location: Bay Area CA
Watch: Yellow Gold
Posts: 20,325
|
From the AD? I say a Sub
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Hobart
Posts: 1,031
|
What about an Explorer II?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Middle East
Posts: 1,809
|
I feel the Explorer is somewhat more versatile for every day life and would be the better option as a “one watch” collection. It would be perfect for office duties as well as weekend duties - maybe not extreme sports though.
The Sub on the other hand obviously leans more toward the sporty side. Perfectly suitable for the office but (for me) not really correct for wearing with a suit so I think I would want a second dressier option for suit days. You may not have this issue though. It’s a close call and they’re both icons. I do love the case shape of the Explorer more than the sub but the Explorer is a much plainer piece. It’s definitely more under the radar. Given the option, I’d go sub if it fits your idea of day to day life. Ultimately though, as a 2 piece collection these two together would be amazing. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Europe
Posts: 284
|
Quote:
Be careful with the factory inaccurarices of explorer 1 before buying. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,225
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,487
|
just go with the iconic rolex sub. no date is better than date. be warned sometimes rolex can get boring
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mitch
Location: UAE
Watch: Big Ben
Posts: 2,451
|
Brand new E1.
__________________
IG: @watch_idiot_savant |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: Bill
Location: Indiana
Watch: Explorer 214270
Posts: 6,665
|
Quote:
__________________
“The real problem of humanity is we have Paleolithic emotions, medieval institutions, and godlike technology.” -Edward O. Wilson |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Neo-Vintage
Posts: 1,214
|
Buy what you like best. For me, I like the bezel and would go with the Sub. I love my 114060.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 1,030
|
Land or Sea?, Explorer vs Submariner? Both are amazing and you genuinely can’t go wrong. I would go Explorer at this moment in your life as it’s easier to build a future collection around - so many options for the submariner going forward (TT, green, black, PM). Plus who knows what Basel will bring...
Good luck however you choose to proceed ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Europe
Posts: 284
|
Please check the other threads the small crown logo bottom hole on the dial.
There are also ones with scratches hands on the net which look disgusting. Sorry but not all models are same quality. You can not expect a Sub GMT or Daytona quality on an Explorer. High prices, long waiting lists have reasons...Realities of painful life. Even Sub Gmt and others will have very minimal inaccuracies under magnification, but you shouldnt be able to see from a distance, if you notice then thats a big headache. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: Chris
Location: East Coast US
Watch: Rolex 116719BLRO
Posts: 489
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mitch
Location: UAE
Watch: Big Ben
Posts: 2,451
|
Quote:
That is incorrect! I had/have Sub, Explorer 2, DJ, E1... and they all had the same built quality!
__________________
IG: @watch_idiot_savant |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Real Name: Cory
Location: US
Watch: 114060
Posts: 652
|
EX2 all day.
![]() Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -------------------------------------------------------------- 116610-214270-116710-113700-114300-M79380RB-Zodiac GR |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: Bill
Location: Indiana
Watch: Explorer 214270
Posts: 6,665
|
Quote:
__________________
“The real problem of humanity is we have Paleolithic emotions, medieval institutions, and godlike technology.” -Edward O. Wilson |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Europe
Posts: 284
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Oregon
Posts: 115
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mitch
Location: UAE
Watch: Big Ben
Posts: 2,451
|
Quote:
Having said that, faults can be found on any model. Exceptions don't make the rule!
__________________
IG: @watch_idiot_savant |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 111
|
I believe a particular you admire... just go for it..
But go with the iconic rolex sub. you will love it |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,175
|
In that price range of 6-8k I'd be looking for a 14060M.
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: San Jose
Watch: 114060 & 16570
Posts: 714
|
Between the two, I would go with the sub.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Real Name: Chris
Location: Philadelphia, Pa
Watch: 214270 / 114060
Posts: 197
|
Explorer I for a great all-arounder! If it's your "only watch" the Explorer makes a lot of sense. It can fit under a tight dress shirt sleeve and is tough enough to go anywhere. I chose my Explorer I over a Sub for that very reason. I had a thought that I would pick up a Sub-No Date eventually (but that was when cases were filled with them). Now I am waiting around like everyone else.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Florida, USA
Watch: 126333, 114060
Posts: 239
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Virginia
Watch: This one.
Posts: 1,763
|
$6-8k - Sub, Explorer or ?
I am a big fan of my explorer. It basically holds all my wrist time. It took me years to realize that the is explorer is my perfect watch. I recently picked up a 116610LN, sized it and brought it home, however, it is still sitting in the box because I keep going for my explorer.
![]()
__________________
♛16610LV, ♛116710BLNR, ♛214270, ♛116610LN, ♛216570, ♛116900, ♛16600, ΩWorldtimer, ΩSpeedmaster Silver Snoopy 45th and 50th, ΩSpeedmaster ST1, ΩCK859, Seiko Alpinist SPB089, Casio Oceanus S100, Ball DM1020 ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,319
|
Save a bit more money and buy a 116610. I like the date function on the Submariner.
__________________
t65tampa |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Real Name: Jake
Location: TN
Watch: 126500
Posts: 556
|
Explorer for the win!
Really, buy what you like. As others have said its a great first Rolex, and you can build a collection around it. Not sure what the quality comments are about... its a Rolex. They make them all to their standards. I haven't seen any issues. Besides its not like they are built in some far off factory by new hire watch makers and just because its a few $K less they just slap parts together. Its an excellent watch. Both are. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Oregon
Posts: 115
|
Good to see this crowd is as split as I am!
I love both...probably the sub slightly more (been a fan of it longer) but the explorer is more versatile and honestly can do it all Such a hard (first world problem) choice! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Atlantis
Posts: 1,448
|
The Explorer is way more versatile. It also looks amazing on virtually any strap.
Honestly you could buy both and have a duo that would last a lifetime. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: Allessandro
Location: Canada
Watch: 16610/16570/16220
Posts: 705
|
Submariner for me! Mind you both are incredible : )
The above bs about the explorer being inferior is just that bs.... in my opinion. Cheers Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.