![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 92
|
5712/1A or 5960p-016 (black dial)
Hi all -
I've decided to trade my 5167A (my only Patek, acquired below msrp in 2015) and my 116170BLNR (acquired at msrp last year) towards a grail piece. Although not a huge fan of the 5711 I love the quirky dial of the 5712. I've also always loved the opaline black dial of the 5960p-016 and the fact it was only made for 1 year is cool. I can honestly say I'm equally enamoured! Both are available to me through a (grey) trade, but I can only get one (economics are almost identical). Whichever one I pick, it will be babied/special occasion watch. Which would it be for you? Any thoughts appreciated! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,604
|
All I can say is that I previously owned both of those watches and regret selling them. I would think twice!
BUT to answer your question the 5712 would be my preference as I like steel and water resistance.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Canada
Watch: all of them
Posts: 653
|
Obviously those are two very different watches! I love my 5712, but it certainly doesn't also have an Annual calendar and chronograph integrated. I love both of those complications, so I'd actually lean towards the 5960. Also considering it'll be a special occasion piece. You don't see as many of those around. Everybody flashes the Nautilus these days.
I feel your trade cost for the Nautilus is mostly from the hype value, whereas the 5960 cost it's the true value of the watch. Of course your Aquanaut hype value is built into your trade, which is nice to take advantage of right now. So my suggestion would be sell the aqua not high, and buy the 5960 "low" (or at actual value). Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: CT
Posts: 9,137
|
I’d go 5712
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: USA
Watch: PP
Posts: 239
|
5712
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
I like the 5712 more but not the grey price, might be worth waiting a while to see how this thing plays out over the summer.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 92
|
I'm not sure it will make a lot of difference to me. My aquanaut has a lot of hype value in it also and that would fall too - maybe (probably more) than the 5712. If i map out what I paid in cash for the two pieces originally, either piece works out around $50k or just under
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 92
|
I mean the 5712 is obviously stunning but this black opaline dial is stunning also. I believe its the only 5960 dial that does not have a contrasting chrono subdial and I read somewhere that only 50-100 pieces were produced (which explains I guess why its way more pricey than the other 5960p models).
So torn! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 92
|
Yes it will be tough to let them go! But they are both 'daily' type watches and have gotten so little wrist time since I finally managed to get a 116500. I am thinking it would be fitting to use them to get something for special occasions
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: .
Posts: 831
|
i would go for the 5960p
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,934
|
I would go with the 5712. I like the 5960p blue better than black.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3,108
|
5960p.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,650
|
Probably 12, it’s one of the best
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 163
|
Very tough decision. If you want something more dressy I’d go with the 5960p. I like both the black and grey dials.
Try not sell your 5167 if you can help it. You may regret it.... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: USA
Watch: Patek and Casio
Posts: 74
|
I think it really depends on the rest of your collection. The 5712 is definitely the more versatile piece and currently "the watch" to have. but the 5960 is a thing of beauty and if your into horology is the more interesting piece. Can't go wrong with either just depends on what direction your looking to take your collection. I have the 5712 and it makes me smile every time I put it on!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 252
|
Whatever you decide to do keep the 5167. It’s a really nice piece that’s not easily replaced.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3,108
|
Looking at this again and it isn’t even close in my opinion. 5960P by a mile and here’s why. For approximately 60-70K you’re choice is a platinum AC & chrono with power reserve, limited quantity and the price has held for a few years on the secondary or a stainless steel scratch magnet with a basically useless moon phase and a measly 48 power reserve with a hype driven price and still in production and lots of them out there. And for your trade watches you’ve got about 28-30K invested. I would make that trade for the 5960P immediately. I’d also wear the 5960P practically every day.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 353
|
The 5960p hands down. It’s a special piece that can be worn daily. As great as the nautilus is, it’s over hyped and not as versatile as the 5960. Once the hype dies down you could also pick up the Nautilus.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 3970
Posts: 3,911
|
If you are going to have a beater like a sub, perhaps the 5960p might suit you better. If one watch collection the 5712a for sure.
I would go with the 5712a first. Ideally both but that is so cliche ;/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Mike G
Location: Ohio
Watch: Rolex-Patek-AP
Posts: 3,080
|
Both really nice but for Me the 5712
__________________
The only thing better than the watches are the people behind them. "The best watch in the world is the one that's on your wrist." Morgan King "Do you like having a good time? Then you need a good watch!" Rocky Balboa |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Michael
Location: Near beach
Watch: PB1967
Posts: 8,302
|
Any Nautilus for that matter.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Doha
Posts: 2,065
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Singapore
Posts: 165
|
I will get the one that is discontinued, small production numbers and never to be produced again. More justified the premium over list price you are paying IMHO.
Cheers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: David
Location: NOVA
Posts: 566
|
5960P. That black dial is a stunner
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 92
|
I just took a quick look on chrono24 and there are only 5 5960p-016 watches listed globally. I am leaning in this direction right now! Plus if I don’t bond with it I guess I could always trade for a nautilus.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: N/A
Posts: 41
|
5960
Imo this watch is underrated at this moment. If you like steel better go with the steel option 5960
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: N/A
Posts: 41
|
Oops forgot the pic
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,568
|
I'd go 5712A in any event. A 13.5mm thick platinum dress watch wouldn't work as a beater for me. I'd not be keen on beating up a 5712A but in the end a banged up Nautilus looks pretty cool, as good as a mint one IMO, just different.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 92
|
It’s going to be a special occasion piece. LOL I don’t think I could bang up any pricey watch :-) I have OCD in general and couldn’t survive that. I’m always worried when wearing the aquanaut about marring the brushed surface. For me, 5960 might be the more wearable option. Plus, the black dial 5960 looks reasonably sporty for a dress watch IMHO
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.