The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14 April 2020, 10:38 PM   #1
gavbaz
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Rochdale
Posts: 24
Some advice 1680 or 16800

Hi
For a while I have wanted to try something a little more vintage.
I have been offered the opportunity to pick up one of these. (Actual watches below).

The 1680 looks in great shape (has top hat) and the 16800 comes on it’s original bracelet.

There is about £4K difference in price. Wondering what you guys think of the watches and what you would go for?
It’s my first dip into vintage with Rolex, I currently own a 114060 but have owned a trit 16610 in the past.



gavbaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2020, 10:57 PM   #2
dnslater
"TRF" Member
 
dnslater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Indiana
Posts: 91
Love that matte bezel and top hat for the 4 digit. What is your goal with this purchase? Just a collector piece or do you plan to actually wear it? 1680 is probably a better collector piece, but the 16800 is a better wearer with the sapphire crystal, quick set date, and better chance of being water resistant. Since you already have a Sub C, the 4 digit would be a fun one to break out and wear every now and then, but I wouldn't want to wear it often.

Of course the older you go the more risk with the purchase as the vintage Rolex market can be a minefield.... make sure you trust the seller.
dnslater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2020, 11:00 PM   #3
gavbaz
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Rochdale
Posts: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by dnslater View Post
Love that matte bezel. What is your goal with this purchase? Just a collector piece or do you plan to actually wear it? 1680 is probably a better collector piece, but the 16800 is a better wearer with the sapphire crystal, quick set date, and better chance of being water resistant.

Thank you. I would definitely like to wear it. I do have a number of watches, so it would be in rotation. Didn’t think of the water proof aspect, yet again I don’t think I would take it swimming.
gavbaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2020, 11:11 PM   #4
1665fan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,659
I’ve had both I would go 1680
1665fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2020, 11:21 PM   #5
dnslater
"TRF" Member
 
dnslater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Indiana
Posts: 91
Quote:
Originally Posted by gavbaz View Post
Thank you. I would definitely like to wear it. I do have a number of watches, so it would be in rotation. Didn’t think of the water proof aspect, yet again I don’t think I would take it swimming.
I'm sure it would be fine with handwashing, rain, etc... if gaskets are in place and lubed.

Some places won't even guarantee older 5 digits for WR. Assuming it comes down to how pitted the metal is where the gaskets are located.
dnslater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2020, 01:03 AM   #6
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
On looks alone I'd go 1680 in this case, but I think you'd get more support on the vintage subforum.
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2020, 01:47 AM   #7
101031-28
"TRF" Member
 
101031-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: 1665
Posts: 4,764
I own both, 1680 would be the choice, if one only.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 16800.jpg (113.0 KB, 128 views)
File Type: jpg 1680.jpg (92.6 KB, 126 views)
__________________
He could not just wear a watch. It had to be a Rolex.

Ian Fleming
101031-28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2020, 02:48 AM   #8
dhknola
"TRF" Member
 
dhknola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 1,174
It's funny, I am super jonesing for a 16800 with white gold surrounds that has aged nicely
dhknola is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2020, 03:54 AM   #9
strafer_kid
"TRF" Member
 
strafer_kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,136
I think the 16800 might be more durable for everyday wear?
strafer_kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.