ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 April 2020, 11:49 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Real Name: Matt
Location: Alberta, Canada
Watch: 16710
Posts: 30
|
16610 - does this look right?
An acquaintance just bought this watch and sent me this photo. He bought the watch from a close friend who he trusts. The seller claims to be the original owner. He says that he got the full kit including the original bill of sale.
The quality of the photo is poor but I had immediate concerns with the date window. The magnification looks wrong and it is also scuffed (does sapphire scuff like that?). He also mentioned that "chrome is flaking off the crown"! These were big red flags for me. As well, it looks quite over-polished. I know his next step should be to get it authenticated but I just wanted some opinions from the forum. I don't want to panic him for no reason. |
16 April 2020, 11:57 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: World
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 855
|
That is not authentic. Bracelet is incorrect, case shape is off, date magnifier is off. Need better pics for dial, hands, bezel to conclude if it's a frankenwatch. Sorry to say this, but your friend was robbed.
|
16 April 2020, 12:47 PM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Real Name: Matt
Location: Alberta, Canada
Watch: 16710
Posts: 30
|
Quote:
Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk |
|
16 April 2020, 01:26 PM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,346
|
Fuzzy fuzzy picture. Still looks bad.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
16 April 2020, 05:46 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Earth
Posts: 766
|
Terrible picture but I think it’s possibly genuine, just badly polished and with an aftermarket crystal. The bezel insert is real. Can you get any clearer pictures? Close up of the dial, side view crown side, back and inner clasp would help.
|
16 April 2020, 10:32 PM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Cologne
Posts: 47
|
Wow, why do so many people who collect expensive watches seem to only have digital cameras from the mid 90s?
Even with this poor quality i see many red flags which mostly already have been addressed: - seemingly low date magnification (this can happen with some 16610s though. - shiny bracelet - overpolished horns / case So what did your buddy pay for this one? |
16 April 2020, 11:54 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Real Name: Matt
Location: Alberta, Canada
Watch: 16710
Posts: 30
|
Here's the whole story for those that have time.
This isn't a friend. This is a person that contacted me regarding an Omega that I advertised for sale locally. I was a bit slow returning his call, and in the meantime he somehow tracked down an old co-worker who he knew owned a Submariner. He asked if it was for sale and it was. When he and I finally connected over the phone, he told me he was going to look at this Submariner. We ended up talking watches for quite a while. He's a nice guy but clearly had done no research. I gave him some basic advice regarding market price on 5-digit Subs. I also told him that if he was going to look at the Sub, I wouldn't mind if he texted me a photo prior to doing the transaction. I don't want anyone to buy a bad watch if I can help it! He texted me that photo AFTER he bought it. He paid the equivalent of about $5k USD. When I saw the photo, I immediately called him and raised concerns. The date window was the first flag, the case shape and bracelet were the second. The third flag was when he told me that some chrome was flaking off the crown! He received the box, papers, anchor, original receipt (from a local AD), and service papers from a local watchmaker. Based on all this and his 30-year relationship with the seller, he's convinced that it IS real. He was quick to dismiss my concerns. Maybe it's a fake watch in a real box, or it's horribly over-polished and serviced with cheap aftermarket parts. It's a bad buy nonetheless. He is still interested in my Omega so I may get to meet him and see this watch first hand. I'll report back. |
17 April 2020, 02:14 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Belize
Posts: 271
|
real but in bad condition, polished and aftermarket Xtal
|
17 April 2020, 02:22 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Real Name: Matt
Location: Alberta, Canada
Watch: 16710
Posts: 30
|
|
17 April 2020, 03:25 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: United States
Watch: me buy Watches
Posts: 3,955
|
Flaking crown? Could be a fake watch.
And sometimes photos are deliberately bad in an attempt to hide the flaws. You should think a LOT more about this watch.
__________________
“The display of actual intelligence terrifies much of mankind” Rolex "some" Tudor "some" Damasko "some" Misc Pieces "some" Marathon "some" GS Spring Drive "some" Hamilton "some" Findeisen "some" |
17 April 2020, 08:58 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,606
|
The image is horrible. Anything flaking off the crown is a big red flag. Need more, clearer images to determine authenticity.
|
17 April 2020, 09:06 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
|
It does not look right.
__________________
|
17 April 2020, 03:49 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,349
|
It may be genuine, however, the case is polished down to a nub... looks like it was high polished with a high polished center link and they sure went to town on it...
|
18 April 2020, 02:57 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Northeast Florida
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 198
|
Doesn't Rolex place the pearl centered on the triangle with the edges of the pearl on the edge of the triangle mark, not extending over it or in some cases off center? To me the date magnification, pearl location and band would raise flags to me.
|
18 April 2020, 04:48 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: Mark
Location: South Carolina
Watch: 126711CHNR
Posts: 511
|
I bet serial doesn’t match paperwork
|
18 April 2020, 05:49 AM | #16 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,016
|
Quote:
I would not bother even a jot. IMHO, the pic he sent is purposely fuzzy. Also doubt his whole story - and his quick dismissal is a red flag. Look for a better buyer for your Omega. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
|
18 April 2020, 06:26 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Real Name: Matt
Location: Alberta, Canada
Watch: 16710
Posts: 30
|
Just a quick update. I met with the owner of the Rolex and sold him my Omega.
He did not bring along the Sub so I was not able to see it first hand. We did discuss it though. He clearly did some more research and was second-guessing his purchase. I politely suggested that he attempt to get his money back. I also provided him the name of my preferred watchmaker and STRONGLY suggested that he have it inspected as soon as possible. I asked him to provide me more photos, but he declined. I suspect it's because he's afraid of what the photos might show. I genuinely feel bad for him. He's new to the hobby and made a bad buy. I tried to help him but it was too late. At least his new Omega is 100% authentic! |
18 April 2020, 06:54 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 241
|
What is the going price for a full kit 80’s sub ?
|
19 April 2020, 03:48 PM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2016
Real Name: Mike
Location: Las Vegas
Watch: TT DJ 16233
Posts: 1,002
|
Run
|
20 April 2020, 12:06 AM | #20 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 8,561
|
|
15 May 2020, 01:18 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Real Name: Matt
Location: Alberta, Canada
Watch: 16710
Posts: 30
|
UPDATE TIME - IT'S REAL!
Today, I reached out the owner of the watch in question. I still had our saved text conversation so I thought I'd check in with him. We texted back and forth a bit and then he called me. I asked him for an update on his 16610. He took it straight to the watchmaker that I recommended. It's currently being overhauled with a new crown and crystal (correct parts). The cost of the service is over twice what I typically pay, indicative that a number of incorrect parts need to be replaced. We talked for quite a while. Great guy and definitely not a scammer. We get along well and hopefully I'll get the opportunity to see this watch. Hopefully, it looks better in person than in the original photo! |
15 May 2020, 03:00 PM | #22 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Tim
Location: USA
Watch: Too many
Posts: 220
|
Quote:
|
|
16 May 2020, 12:35 AM | #23 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,346
|
Quote:
Great update! I will say you have more interest in a stranger than I would have. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.