The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13 May 2009, 10:20 AM   #1
allanofcalifornia
"TRF" Member
 
allanofcalifornia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Allan
Location: California
Posts: 3,210
Don't understand the popularity of the Zenith SS Daytona

I don't understand the popularity of the Zenith SS Daytona. The gold (WG/YG) and TT versions of the Zenith Daytona are cheaper than the newer models BUT the SS version of the Zenith Daytona is more expensive than the newer models and more expensive than a brand new one from an AD.

Can someone explain why this is so? I can understand if the Zenith version of the Daytona is more collectible but if this was the case, then I would expect all versions of the Zenith Daytona going up in price and not just the SS version. Does it all boil down to the fact that the SS Daytona is in demand while the other versions are not that popular?


Thanks
Allan
allanofcalifornia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 10:46 AM   #2
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,499
It's popular because it's discontinued.........



and those who have/want one think that theirs will be the next Newman and worth 80,000 by Christmas.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 10:47 AM   #3
therolexguy
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
therolexguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Todd
Location: US
Posts: 3,528
Stainless is always more collectable and since the Zenith is pre-2000, people think it's more collectable. I like the new in-house movement. It's made by Rolex, it has a longer power reserve and is more efficient with it's rotor. It's just plain bad A**.
therolexguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 10:53 AM   #4
Mrdi
Banned
 
Mrdi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 3,478
72 hour reserve
Yahoo
Take it off on Friday and it is still running strong Monday morning.\
Perfect for my life style.
Mrdi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 11:18 AM   #5
Gaijin
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Gaijin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Japan
Watch: ing your back.
Posts: 16,179
And I am guessing that the SS versions of the Zenith daytona were made is lesser numbers than the TT and YG versions. Thus more rare and expensive.
Gaijin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 11:22 AM   #6
allanofcalifornia
"TRF" Member
 
allanofcalifornia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Allan
Location: California
Posts: 3,210
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
It's popular because it's discontinued.........
If that was the case, then the zenith version of the gold and TT would cost more since the zenith model for all versions are discontinued.


Allan
allanofcalifornia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 11:26 AM   #7
allanofcalifornia
"TRF" Member
 
allanofcalifornia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Allan
Location: California
Posts: 3,210
Quote:
Originally Posted by KansaiVet View Post
And I am guessing that the SS versions of the Zenith daytona were made is lesser numbers than the TT and YG versions. Thus more rare and expensive.
I would have thought that they sold many more SS zenith daytona watches.


Allan
allanofcalifornia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 11:33 AM   #8
Chozn1
"TRF" Member
 
Chozn1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South GA
Watch: Sub and President
Posts: 1,501
Daytonas= rare.
Daytonas with any type of limited production run= pretty rare, very expensive.
It's not my cup of tea, but they just get a lot of attention. I had one and really don't get what all the fuss is about, but whatever floats your boat.
__________________
Current Models...
(K)Bluesy
(M) TT DJ
In search of DayDate
Prior models... Just about everything.
Chozn1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 11:48 AM   #9
Art 1
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
The answer to your last question is yes.
Art 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 12:28 PM   #10
TheVTCGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
I actually like the dial of the Zenith better, the sweep -second hand at the 9:00 position instead of the 6:00. I would rather have mine, with the newer movement, but the "Z" is a mighty good looking watch!
TheVTCGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 12:32 PM   #11
Gaijin
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Gaijin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Japan
Watch: ing your back.
Posts: 16,179
Quote:
Originally Posted by allanofcalifornia View Post
I would have thought that they sold many more SS zenith daytona watches.


Allan
You may be right. I was just basing this on what Rolex is doing with current SS Daytonas. Making fewer of them.

Anybody know if the SS Zenith Daytonas were made in lower numbers than the TT and YG?
Gaijin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 12:55 PM   #12
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,309
Quote:
Originally Posted by allanofcalifornia View Post
I don't understand the popularity of the Zenith SS Daytona. The gold (WG/YG) and TT versions of the Zenith Daytona are cheaper than the newer models BUT the SS version of the Zenith Daytona is more expensive than the newer models and more expensive than a brand new one from an AD.

Can someone explain why this is so? I can understand if the Zenith version of the Daytona is more collectible but if this was the case, then I would expect all versions of the Zenith Daytona going up in price and not just the SS version. Does it all boil down to the fact that the SS Daytona is in demand while the other versions are not that popular?


Thanks
Allan
It's history, vintage now, and it had a great movement. Here's a shot of my 1992 Zenith Daytona sandwiched between my 1982 and 1987 Tudor chronos.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg tudor.chrono 011a.jpg (74.3 KB, 471 views)
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 12:55 PM   #13
kzm40
"TRF" Member
 
kzm40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 713
Quote:
Originally Posted by KansaiVet View Post
And I am guessing that the SS versions of the Zenith daytona were made is lesser numbers than the TT and YG versions. Thus more rare and expensive.
They were selling at the same premium as the newer model for a while, but as they're not being made anymore, no increase in supply.. My Red sub was the same price as a new 16610 when i bought it..Its worth a little more now.
kzm40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 05:05 PM   #14
Singslinger
"TRF" Member
 
Singslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
For almost all brands and models, the S/S version is always considered much more collectible than the TT or full-gold models. I'm not 100% sure why this is, but I think it could be because gold watches are seen as being too "bling'' and thus somehow lacking in "street cred''. Whatever the case, if you have a desirable S/S model which is then discontinued, it's very likely that the collectibility value rises sharply and hence the price.

My first experience of this was with the Lange 1, the flagship model made by the German brand Lange & Sohne. The company used to make it in S/S as well as all the precious metals, but once it discontinued the S/S version, secondhand prices for this model shot through the roof. I believe a used S/S Lange 1 now costs perhaps 50% more than a brand-new, white gold equivalent.

Hope this answers your question.
Singslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 07:32 PM   #15
Atomant
"TRF" Member
 
Atomant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fernwood
Posts: 3,455
Yeah came across an 'F' S/S Zenith Daytona that's selling for S$18,500 and it looks pretty beat up.
__________________
116613LN 16600SD 16610LV 116710 16710 16570 Speedy 3570.50 PAM25 Oris TT1 and a bunch of G-Shocks. Flipped: Daytona 116520 Seamaster 2231.80
Atomant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 07:41 PM   #16
Gaijin
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Gaijin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Japan
Watch: ing your back.
Posts: 16,179
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atomant View Post
Yeah came across an 'F' S/S Zenith Daytona that's selling for S$18,500 and it looks pretty beat up.
That is way too steep. Plus an F is not a Zenith.
Gaijin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 08:44 PM   #17
handdoc
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New England
Posts: 328
its all about want and collectability
handdoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 08:48 PM   #18
chu88y
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: LONDON
Watch: SDDS
Posts: 660
believe it or not more TT Daytona's are made than SS making the SS a rarer beast to find
chu88y is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 08:50 PM   #19
Art 1
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atomant View Post
Yeah came across an 'F' S/S Zenith Daytona that's selling for S$18,500 and it looks pretty beat up.
No such animal.
Art 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 10:51 PM   #20
ippon20
2024 Pledge Member
 
ippon20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Dan
Location: Orlando/NSB, FL
Watch: 16710 (3186)
Posts: 1,629
Yes, there were more TT and YG made than the SS I believe. It was very difficult to find SS back then, it was a true grail. That said, I prefer my Zenith over newer models....TT is gonna make a comeback, mark my words!
__________________
Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas International GTG 2016
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2018

Instagram @pivot_and_spine
ippon20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 10:53 PM   #21
ROLEX MAN
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
ROLEX MAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: Home and Away
Watch: you? "YES PLEASE"!
Posts: 3,716
had 2 and sold both!
__________________


it's not just about telling the time...

happy rolexing...



I'm just a man with a passion
ROLEX MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 10:59 PM   #22
mortal
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: John
Location: Tokyo
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by Singslinger View Post
the S/S version is always considered much more collectible than the TT or full-gold models. I'm not 100% sure why this is, but I think it could be because gold watches are seen as being too "bling'' and thus somehow lacking in "street cred''. Whatever the case, if you have a desirable S/S model which is then discontinued, it's very likely that the collectibility value rises sharply and hence the price.
That's really interesting. As I've been looking into Rolexes these last couple months, I've gone out of my way to look at gold bracelets only. And with each sales rep I used the same line: "If it's Rolex, it's got to be gold, right" to which they inevitably smile and agree. For my first one, I did the right thing (for me), but you've given me a great new perspective for Rolex #2.

mortal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 May 2009, 05:43 AM   #23
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,309
Quote:
Originally Posted by springer View Post
It's history, vintage now, and it had a great movement. Here's a shot of my 1992 Zenith Daytona sandwiched between my 1982 and 1987 Tudor chronos.
So as not to confuse anyone, my Tiger Tudor is a 1997 not 1987. Got carried away on my typing...sorry.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 May 2009, 07:30 AM   #24
Otto
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
Otto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Japan
Watch: Daytona and others
Posts: 3,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by Singslinger View Post
For almost all brands and models, the S/S version is always considered much more collectible than the TT or full-gold models. I'm not 100% sure why this is, but I think it could be because gold watches are seen as being too "bling'' and thus somehow lacking in "street cred''. Whatever the case, if you have a desirable S/S model which is then discontinued, it's very likely that the collectibility value rises sharply and hence the price.

My first experience of this was with the Lange 1, the flagship model made by the German brand Lange & Sohne. The company used to make it in S/S as well as all the precious metals, but once it discontinued the S/S version, secondhand prices for this model shot through the roof. I believe a used S/S Lange 1 now costs perhaps 50% more than a brand-new, white gold equivalent.

Hope this answers your question.
It may be the gold when it comes to the "Zenith" Daytona (no comment on the "bling" comment), but I think for a different reason than "street cred." I suspect Rolex makes a larger profit on Daytona watches with gold content, so they make more of them; so there are fewer SS Daytonas made and sold; and since they are no longer making the "Zentih" Daytona, prices rise. I'm guessing, because maybe the sales volume for SS watches levels the playing field when it comes to gold content watches that are priced higher and maybe sell less frequently. Who knows? Rolex knows.

As for the "Zenith" SS Daytona, the white dial version is still IMO one of the best if not the best looking Daytonas around and it is slowly disappearing from the affordable (at least for me) market, maybe because it has been discontinued and there aren't that many around compared to other watches of the same period.
Otto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 May 2009, 08:40 AM   #25
pedsdoc3
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: new orleans
Posts: 13
Ok check out my observations on ss

I never really get the whole ss versus tt thing. No matter what, a solid gold watch unless rare like the zenith will generally be worth more that a ss watch. i find that this forum is very heavy of rolex prof series daytona, gmt, dssd, sub. which doesnt really necessarily represent the majority of rolex wearers. Most rolexes sold are not tool watches. I travel alot as do most of you guys and i think that most people that own watches like ours have their prefs but really in REAL life most could never own a rolex and then when they finally can, they will ALWAYS get the ss because they would rather have any rolex than wait another couple of years to buy a platinum or solid gold one. so as a consequence more people by default will have ss and will think ss is better because thats what they can afford and they like what they can afford. Sooooooooooooo with that said if you could get a brushed plat sub date with no polished links for the same price as a ss i am sure every "pro ss" person would. I OWN BOTH AND I LOVE THIS FORUM!!! lol JUST MY 2CENTS
pedsdoc3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 May 2009, 08:49 AM   #26
PalmSpringsCaVault
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: palm springs CA
Watch: Plat.118296DayDate
Posts: 192
allen are you still window shopping, I hope your not driving my contact crazy with picture requests because you havent done your homework!
PalmSpringsCaVault is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 May 2009, 09:44 AM   #27
allanofcalifornia
"TRF" Member
 
allanofcalifornia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Allan
Location: California
Posts: 3,210
Quote:
Originally Posted by PalmSpringsCaVault View Post
allen are you still window shopping, I hope your not driving my contact crazy with picture requests because you havent done your homework!
Unfortunately the 2 zenith watches your contact had did not come with papers.


Allan
allanofcalifornia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 May 2009, 10:26 AM   #28
Atomant
"TRF" Member
 
Atomant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fernwood
Posts: 3,455
Quote:
Originally Posted by KansaiVet View Post
That is way too steep. Plus an F is not a Zenith.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art 1 View Post
No such animal.
Noted.
__________________
116613LN 16600SD 16610LV 116710 16710 16570 Speedy 3570.50 PAM25 Oris TT1 and a bunch of G-Shocks. Flipped: Daytona 116520 Seamaster 2231.80
Atomant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 May 2009, 10:28 AM   #29
Atomant
"TRF" Member
 
Atomant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fernwood
Posts: 3,455
Quote:
Originally Posted by pedsdoc3 View Post
I never really get the whole ss versus tt thing. No matter what, a solid gold watch unless rare like the zenith will generally be worth more that a ss watch. i find that this forum is very heavy of rolex prof series daytona, gmt, dssd, sub. which doesnt really necessarily represent the majority of rolex wearers. Most rolexes sold are not tool watches. I travel alot as do most of you guys and i think that most people that own watches like ours have their prefs but really in REAL life most could never own a rolex and then when they finally can, they will ALWAYS get the ss because they would rather have any rolex than wait another couple of years to buy a platinum or solid gold one. so as a consequence more people by default will have ss and will think ss is better because thats what they can afford and they like what they can afford. Sooooooooooooo with that said if you could get a brushed plat sub date with no polished links for the same price as a ss i am sure every "pro ss" person would. I OWN BOTH AND I LOVE THIS FORUM!!! lol JUST MY 2CENTS
Totally agree.
__________________
116613LN 16600SD 16610LV 116710 16710 16570 Speedy 3570.50 PAM25 Oris TT1 and a bunch of G-Shocks. Flipped: Daytona 116520 Seamaster 2231.80
Atomant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 May 2009, 10:46 AM   #30
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,309
Quote:
Originally Posted by pedsdoc3 View Post
I never really get the whole ss versus tt thing. No matter what, a solid gold watch unless rare like the zenith will generally be worth more that a ss watch. i find that this forum is very heavy of rolex prof series daytona, gmt, dssd, sub. which doesnt really necessarily represent the majority of rolex wearers. Most rolexes sold are not tool watches. I travel alot as do most of you guys and i think that most people that own watches like ours have their prefs but really in REAL life most could never own a rolex and then when they finally can, they will ALWAYS get the ss because they would rather have any rolex than wait another couple of years to buy a platinum or solid gold one. so as a consequence more people by default will have ss and will think ss is better because thats what they can afford and they like what they can afford. Sooooooooooooo with that said if you could get a brushed plat sub date with no polished links for the same price as a ss i am sure every "pro ss" person would. I OWN BOTH AND I LOVE THIS FORUM!!! lol JUST MY 2CENTS
Interesting New Orleans. I think you point has some merit.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.