|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
10 July 2021, 02:51 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 14
|
Tudor vs. Rolex 32xx
Why are there no complaints in these threads by owners of Tudor in-house movements similar to complaints in these threads by owners of Rolex 32xx movements? Specifically, excessively slow timekeeping with low amplitude. Both movements boast 70 hour PR. Is Tudor movement better than Rolex 32xx?
|
|
|
|
10 July 2021, 02:57 AM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: East Coast
Watch: 16610
Posts: 4,933
|
Whelp, there were lots of posts here about the tudor gmt movement a couple years ago, albeit not that many in the scheme of things. Each time a new movement comes out there are some glitches (also seen with new omega speedy). They will work them out and would not anticipate problems in the future. However the older Rolex movements were bullet proof and the constant push to innovate (albeit little) to justify the ever increasing prices will cause these things to happen more frequently.
|
|
|
|
|
10 July 2021, 04:16 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Nick
Location: Las Vegas
Watch: 1601
Posts: 10,615
|
Tudor vs. Rolex 32xx
Not better. But the 32xx series of Rolex is newer than the MT56xx and MT54xx and just need kinks worked out
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
