The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27 May 2009, 01:55 PM   #1
Saladin
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Sani Jadoon
Location: Australia
Watch: GMTII(Z)-Pepsi
Posts: 197
Icon5 GMT Master II with 3186 Movement.

Hi guys, a friend of mine told me that there are only a few Non Ceramic GMt II 's (16710) produced by Rolex that have the new 3186 movement (instead of the regular 3185). These are the late Z and M series models. Is this correct? What are your thoughts on that?
Saladin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2009, 02:29 PM   #2
scottschoe
"TRF" Member
 
scottschoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 3,295
Correct, although we don't know how many are out there. People place different weight on those quirky models...some don't care, others do (I lean towards the latter). Search for the wiggle test for an easy way to test.

I had two of the 3186 models...gone now

__________________
__________________
scottschoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2009, 02:33 PM   #3
Saladin
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Sani Jadoon
Location: Australia
Watch: GMTII(Z)-Pepsi
Posts: 197
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottschoe View Post
Correct, although we don't know how many are out there. People place different weight on those quirky models...some don't care, others do (I lean towards the latter). Search for the wiggle test for an easy way to test.

I had two of the 3186 models...gone now

Cheers Scott
Saladin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2009, 02:47 PM   #4
Z-Sub
2025 Pledge Member
 
Z-Sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
great reading.
one thing I like to point out is that stick ll dial is not unique to those with 3186 movement. it was found in the D serial as well and I happen to like the cleaner look of it more.
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z"
SS SeaDweller "D"
SS Submariner "Random"
TT Blue Submariner "P"
SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi
Pam 311, 524, 297
Z-Sub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2009, 03:16 PM   #5
Saladin
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Sani Jadoon
Location: Australia
Watch: GMTII(Z)-Pepsi
Posts: 197
Quote:
Originally Posted by Z-Sub View Post
great reading.
one thing I like to point out is that stick ll dial is not unique to those with 3186 movement. it was found in the D serial as well and I happen to like the cleaner look of it more.
yep, that what the link says as well
Saladin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2009, 10:27 PM   #6
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,219
Yes but why would anyone think the 3186 is superior to the 3185 grant you perhaps the time zone setting is better.But superior IMHO around the same, and all Rolex movements have to pass the same COSC test as for any other Rolex movement no matter whats parts are inside.As to becoming collectable well IMO doubtful the only true way to tell is get the back off, that alone would turn most collectors off.Would say a 1987 sub with a 3035 be worth anymore than say a 1988 sub with the 3135 would doubt it.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2009, 11:20 PM   #7
Imtiaz
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: De
Location: Tokyo
Watch: Daytona, Sub, DS,
Posts: 1,046
As the years go by, collectors tend to pick on some small quirk to create a collectible Rolex.

The GMT II with the 3186 may become one of these collectibles. Wish I could peep into the future.
Imtiaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 May 2009, 01:52 AM   #8
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2025 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,636
It may...but I doubt it..... No standard production Rolex to date sees a marked difference in it's value because the movement was modified.. And movements have been changed within production runs since the beginning.

Also, if it were to suddenly sky-rocket compared to others, then many Explorer II models would be swapped out for their 3186 movements..

As a matter of fact, right now I'll bet that there are some who have bought the GMT w/3186, and it is one they paid a premium for but has a movement out of the Exp II in it... There is simply no way to ever know...
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 May 2009, 04:26 AM   #9
tinstar
"TRF" Member
 
tinstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Southwest
Posts: 270
The GMT-II (M serial) will always be special just because it is the last serial of the old style GMT.....3186 or not.
Just like the first serial of the new GMT2c will be.
__________________
1991 GMT-II Coke 2007 Exp II White
2007 GMT-IIc
2008 Sub Date
2008 Seadweller
2ea. 2008 GMT-II 3186 Coke (late "M")
tinstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 May 2009, 04:40 AM   #10
scottjal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Scott
Location: SC
Watch: GMT II
Posts: 464
I suspect there are lot more 3186 16710's out there than people realize and it is a nice to have thing to note in a FS listing. I had a stick dial and they too are all over the place. I doubt either of those things will make it a high value item in the future.
__________________
sj
scottjal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 May 2009, 07:57 PM   #11
fly-dad
"TRF" Member
 
fly-dad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Maui Breach
Watch: GMT IIc
Posts: 230
Here is an interesting factoid I just read and tested on my M Serial 16710 with suspected 3186.

The "Turn Test"....Pull out the crown to position two...the position where rotating the crown will jump just the hour hand...rotate the crown one complete revolution counting how many times the hour had jumps....3186 should be 8....3185 should be 5 to 6. My 16710 jumps 8 hours...can anyone with a early Z or previous 16710 confirm how many hours the hand jumps with one revolution of the crown?

Cheers
__________________
You will begin to touch heaven, Jonathan, in the moment you touch the perfect speed. And that isn't flying a thousand miles an hour, or a million, or flying at the speed of light. Because any number is a limit, and perfect speed, my son, is being there. R. Bach JLS
fly-dad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 May 2009, 08:26 PM   #12
Colnago
"TRF" Member
 
Colnago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Bill Hart
Location: Richmond, NY, UK
Watch: Rlx=3, Tdr=3, Om=3
Posts: 3,053
I can't confirm that but I can say I just tried this on my GMT II C which of course has the 3186....yep 8 hours advance on one rotation of the crown......maybe that is the simplest way to tell them apart without opening the case back....just need someone with a 3185 to confirm theirs does 5 or 6 hours on one crown rotation
__________________
Bill
"There's only three kinds of people in this world....those that can count....and those that can't"
TRF's "JJ's" Bar & NightClub Patron
Colnago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 May 2009, 08:34 PM   #13
MrCowboy99
"TRF" Member
 
MrCowboy99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Mac
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,367
I have two of the 16710s. Both are 3186s movements and one is with a stick dial and the other is a box number (See avatar). One is a late Z and other stick is a M serial. Both are great watches!
__________________
I do not offer or provide any Rolex investment advice or opinion regarding the nature, potential, value, suitability or profitability of any particular watch, collections of watches, transaction or investment watch collecting strategy, and you shall be fully responsible for any watch decisions you make, and such decisions will be based solely on your evaluation of your financial circumstances, watch objectives, risk tolerance, and what looks good in yoru opinion on your wrist.
MrCowboy99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 May 2009, 10:18 PM   #14
thecoinopcollector
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Pa
Posts: 409
First of all the wiggle test works. I owned a Z3XXXX 16710 and confirmed it had the 3186 by having the case back removed. I sold it but wish I hadn't. "
thecoinopcollector is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 May 2009, 10:22 PM   #15
scottschoe
"TRF" Member
 
scottschoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 3,295
[QUOTE=thecoinopcollector;1193222]First of all the wiggle test works. I owned a Z3XXXX 16710 and confirmed it had the 3186 by having the case back removed. I sold it but wish I hadn't. "


A Z3 with the 3186? I've never heard of a 16710 anywhere near that range with it. Pics? BS meter is high....or typo?
__________________
__________________
scottschoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 May 2009, 10:30 PM   #16
thecoinopcollector
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Pa
Posts: 409
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottschoe View Post
A Z3 with the 3186? I've never heard of a 16710 anywhere near that range with it. Pics? BS meter is high....or typo?
Man Scott, you are a ball buster. You are correct, however, it was M3XXXXX.
Sold to another TRF member.
Attached Images
   
thecoinopcollector is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 May 2009, 10:31 PM   #17
scottschoe
"TRF" Member
 
scottschoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 3,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoinopcollector View Post
Man Scott, you are a ball buster. You are correct, however, it was M3XXXXX.
Sold to another TRF member.
sorry. No harm meant.
__________________
__________________
scottschoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 May 2009, 01:20 AM   #18
fly-dad
"TRF" Member
 
fly-dad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Maui Breach
Watch: GMT IIc
Posts: 230
Any one out there with a GMT II w/3185 able to verify?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Colnago View Post
I can't confirm that but I can say I just tried this on my GMT II C which of course has the 3186....yep 8 hours advance on one rotation of the crown......maybe that is the simplest way to tell them apart without opening the case back....just need someone with a 3185 to confirm theirs does 5 or 6 hours on one crown rotation
__________________
You will begin to touch heaven, Jonathan, in the moment you touch the perfect speed. And that isn't flying a thousand miles an hour, or a million, or flying at the speed of light. Because any number is a limit, and perfect speed, my son, is being there. R. Bach JLS
fly-dad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 May 2009, 01:24 AM   #19
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2025 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,636
Quote:
Originally Posted by fly-dad View Post
Any one out there with a GMT II w/3185 able to verify?
3185's click 5 hours with one complete rotation when checked on the smaller twinlock crown..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 May 2009, 01:27 AM   #20
fly-dad
"TRF" Member
 
fly-dad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Maui Breach
Watch: GMT IIc
Posts: 230
I assume that the "turn test" is as reliable, if not more reliable, than the "wiggle test".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
3185's click 5 hours with one complete rotation when checked on the smaller twinlock crown..
__________________
You will begin to touch heaven, Jonathan, in the moment you touch the perfect speed. And that isn't flying a thousand miles an hour, or a million, or flying at the speed of light. Because any number is a limit, and perfect speed, my son, is being there. R. Bach JLS
fly-dad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 May 2009, 01:32 AM   #21
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2025 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,636
Quote:
Originally Posted by fly-dad View Post
I assume that the "turn test" is as reliable, if not more reliable, than the "wiggle test".
Seeing as the only difference in these two movements is a change to the gears that affect the "jump" hand, then I would say yes, the gear change for the 3186 results in a quicker ratio for the jump hand........
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2009, 11:33 AM   #22
Andad
2025 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,725
One day we might find out all of the differences between a 3185 and a 3186 and why Rolex gave it a different number. More than just a 'parachute' spring IMO.
Perhaps one of our resident watcmakers could list all the differences in the movement (plates, gears etc) if they ever finds a spare minute.. If there is a difference in the gearing then some parts from the 3185 might not be interchangeable with the 3186?
IMO it seems that some Forum members minimise the differences between these movements and some make more of the differences than they should. The truth is out there.
__________________
E

Andad is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2009, 04:36 AM   #23
Casey VP-26
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: America
Posts: 2,731
Icon20 Heva hava

I Havew 2 brand new 16710's GMT MASTER II one is a M36XXXX the other is aZ86XXXXserial Number and just got done counting Hour jump per one revolution of the winding crown and both jump 8 hours per revolution as far as I know from other forums this Z serial number is one of the earliest Known for possibably having the 3186 movement. Note: Ser. # Z86-(3186) Could this be where Rolex Started The 3186 Movement ? Just Speculation . Also Both Watches pass the Wiggle Test. I Have not opened either case and dont intend to. Thanks for the information on counting the hour jumps . CHIN CHIN
Casey VP-26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

WatchShell

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2025, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.