The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25 November 2021, 11:32 AM   #1
ILuvSubs
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,009
Glidelock on 5 digits with SEL

I have a 16610LV and changing over from the 93250 bracelet to the 97200 glidelock has transformed the watch wearing experience.

The 93250 was no slouch but the Glidelock makes the 16610LV feel much more robust, modern, hefty and balanced on the wrist.

What an amazing mod!! I was able to source a Glidelock bracelet from a different forum and I can recommend anyone who has a 5 digit reference that can fit SELs to convert to the Glidelock bracelet.

Glidelock bracelets can be tough to come by, but they’re worth the wait when they come up for sale on the classifieds.
__________________
2 Factor Authentication Enabled
ILuvSubs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 November 2021, 12:10 PM   #2
jgottsman11
2024 Pledge Member
 
jgottsman11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: wHerE do U liv
Watch: President
Posts: 1,446
Can you post a pic?
__________________
5164R Aquanaut "Tiffany & Co"
18238 Champagne Day Date
jgottsman11 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 25 November 2021, 12:13 PM   #3
mquarter
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Asia
Watch: 5-digit steel
Posts: 384
Is the glidelock compatible with the 16710 I wonder?
mquarter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 November 2021, 12:33 PM   #4
ILuvSubs
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by mquarter View Post
Is the glidelock compatible with the 16710 I wonder?

I think SELs on 16710 started around 2000, so you would need to check if your model has SELs. If so, Glidelock would fit.

Here are some pics. The on the fly adjustability with the Glidelock is awesome too! I love the classic non-super case with the modern features of the updated bracelet.




__________________
2 Factor Authentication Enabled
ILuvSubs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 November 2021, 02:51 PM   #5
offrdmania
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
offrdmania's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,991
I had a glidelock clasp on my 14060M for years and the thin 5-digit lugs with the glidelock clasp made it the most comfortable watch. I just swapped out the clasp only leaving the hollow lugs and end links from my original 93150 bracelet.

The glidelock SELs will only work on 5-digit models which originally came with SEL bracelets. The SEL on the 97200 glidelock will be taller than the 5-digit lugs since they were made for the later taller lug maxi cases.
__________________
TRF Member 11738
offrdmania is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 November 2021, 03:00 PM   #6
Loevhagen
"TRF" Member
 
Loevhagen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The aperture
Posts: 4,941
Quote:
Originally Posted by offrdmania View Post
I had a glidelock clasp on my 14060M for years and the thin 5-digit lugs with the glidelock clasp made it the most comfortable watch. I just swapped out the clasp only leaving the hollow lugs and end links from my original 93150 bracelet.

The glidelock SELs will only work on 5-digit models which originally came with SEL bracelets. The SEL on the 97200 glidelock will be taller than the 5-digit lugs since they were made for the later taller lug maxi cases.
Please take into account that the case of a 14060(M) s slightly smaller in diameter) than a 16610 and a 16710. The best fit is therefore with the two latter models.
Loevhagen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 November 2021, 03:13 PM   #7
mquarter
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Asia
Watch: 5-digit steel
Posts: 384
Quote:
Originally Posted by offrdmania View Post
I had a glidelock clasp on my 14060M for years and the thin 5-digit lugs with the glidelock clasp made it the most comfortable watch. I just swapped out the clasp only leaving the hollow lugs and end links from my original 93150 bracelet.

The glidelock SELs will only work on 5-digit models which originally came with SEL bracelets. The SEL on the 97200 glidelock will be taller than the 5-digit lugs since they were made for the later taller lug maxi cases.
When you say you swapped out the clasp only, what about the bracelet links (between the clasp and the hollow end link). Did they come from the glidelock bracelet or the 93150 bracelet?

If it's possible to fit the 97200 onto the 14060M I'd consider it. I've got smaller wrists and can't get a comfortable fit from the 93150. The best I could do was reversing the bracelet to get the clasp to sit more centered on the underside of my wrist, to avoid the case shifting to the 12 o'clock. Not sure if the glidelock would alleviate this problem?
mquarter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 November 2021, 03:30 PM   #8
offrdmania
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
offrdmania's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,991
Both use a 15.5mm removable link so you can use the hollow removable links from the 93150 or you can use the solid removable links from the 97200. Both will screw together without issue. I even screwed in the half link from the 97200 and used it on my 93150 with the glidelock clasp.
__________________
TRF Member 11738
offrdmania is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 November 2021, 03:35 PM   #9
Pattyb69
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: CT
Watch: BLNR|LVC|PAM 911
Posts: 1,085
I did this on my 16610ln and didn’t love it. Definitely felt more robust but it didn’t feel balanced to me since the GL clasp + solid bracelet made the set up feel bottom heavy. Weight didn’t feel as evenly distributed compared to when the bracelet was on my 116610lv. Ended up going back to the tuna can bracelet
Pattyb69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 November 2021, 04:08 PM   #10
mquarter
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Asia
Watch: 5-digit steel
Posts: 384
Quote:
Originally Posted by offrdmania View Post
Both use a 15.5mm removable link so you can use the hollow removable links from the 93150 or you can use the solid removable links from the 97200. Both will screw together without issue. I even screwed in the half link from the 97200 and used it on my 93150 with the glidelock clasp.
Thanks, I saw your 2 min project thread from 2017. What size wrist are you?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pattyb69 View Post
I did this on my 16610ln and didn’t love it. Definitely felt more robust but it didn’t feel balanced to me since the GL clasp + solid bracelet made the set up feel bottom heavy. Weight didn’t feel as evenly distributed compared to when the bracelet was on my 116610lv. Ended up going back to the tuna can bracelet
Interesting, thanks for your feedback. What's the tuna can bracelet? What size wrist are you?
mquarter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 November 2021, 11:58 PM   #11
Rori
"TRF" Member
 
Rori's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Middle East
Watch: Rolex / Tudor
Posts: 3,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILuvSubs View Post
I have a 16610LV and changing over from the 93250 bracelet to the 97200 glidelock has transformed the watch wearing experience.

The 93250 was no slouch but the Glidelock makes the 16610LV feel much more robust, modern, hefty and balanced on the wrist.

What an amazing mod!! I was able to source a Glidelock bracelet from a different forum and I can recommend anyone who has a 5 digit reference that can fit SELs to convert to the Glidelock bracelet.

Glidelock bracelets can be tough to come by, but they’re worth the wait when they come up for sale on the classifieds.

Once I used the gladelock I now doubt I’ll be able to buy a watch without such a system.
I move mine at least one notch plus or minus every day and up to two notches depending on season and my trainings paces. If my watch was not fitted with a glidelock I imagine the headache I would have had wearing it comfortably.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Good watches are made to tell time but some brands are obsessed to tell it in the most beautiful way possible.
Rori is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2021, 12:03 AM   #12
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pattyb69 View Post
I did this on my 16610ln and didn’t love it. Definitely felt more robust but it didn’t feel balanced to me since the GL clasp + solid bracelet made the set up feel bottom heavy. Weight didn’t feel as evenly distributed compared to when the bracelet was on my 116610lv. Ended up going back to the tuna can bracelet
That would be my guess too

Sometimes things are best left original YMMV
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2021, 01:07 AM   #13
Ketler
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 467
I find the 93150 and the 93160 much more comfortable than the newer bracelets...
Ketler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2021, 01:37 AM   #14
envuks
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
envuks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New England
Posts: 3,741
Lovely setup. I always hated those 5 digit clasps

Enjoy and thanks for sharing


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Current watches: 116718ln, 116500 black dial, 40mm Breitling Chronomat MOP dial

“A man with one watch always knows what time it is. A man with two watches is never sure.”
envuks is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.