![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: what would your second watch be? | |||
124270 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
28 | 33.73% |
126610LV |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
55 | 66.27% |
Voters: 83. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Submarine
Posts: 376
|
If you had to complete a two watch collection, first being a 14060m
Which would you choose and why? 124270 or 126610LV
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 1,399
|
I would chose the LV just because it would feel a bit more special and nothing wrong with having 2 subs even if they were gonna be your only 2.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
|
Neither IMHO, I would get an Omega Speedmaster
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Anchorage Alaska
Posts: 613
|
Those are pretty limited choices if you are only going to have two. I’d do a 16710 or speedmaster or both
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: US
Watch: sub
Posts: 2,463
|
I have a 14060M and when I think about another watch I think about something really different. If a Rolex then maybe a DD. Or maybe a Santos or a Sinn.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: MD
Posts: 60
|
C. None of the above
__________________
♛ 126300 Blue | 126610LN | 126710BLNR | 126710BLRO | 116500LN White | 116518LN Black |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: Mark
Location: Southern England
Watch: DJ41 SubC SMP mast
Posts: 1,764
|
I’d be inclined to get an exp ii instead. Or a chrono. Or a datejust even - basically something else that’s not another sub.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Europe
Posts: 794
|
Explorer.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Harold
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 949
|
Ditto
__________________
Instagram @MechanicalLuxury |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: EU
Posts: 50
|
DD YG 36mm
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 3,013
|
If you had to complete a two watch collection, first being a 14060m
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 79,862
|
I’d add a 16710 or a speedy
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Doug
Location: Charlotte, NC
Watch: Daytona BLNR SubLV
Posts: 2,275
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Uranus
Watch: 116500LN
Posts: 4,799
|
Not sure what the first option is so went with the LV lol
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Chris
Location: Austin
Watch: 6 digit Rolex+APRO
Posts: 1,565
|
Explorer 1 and no date sub make a perfect combo.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Middle East
Posts: 1,809
|
Datejust. It’s the absolute perfect combo
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Aus
Posts: 444
|
124273.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex & Tudor
Posts: 2,253
|
Datejust, maybe 36mm TT, pyramid dial.
__________________
The perfect blossom is a rare thing. You could spend your life looking for one, and it would not be a wasted life. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: America
Posts: 715
|
Given the limited choices, the Cermit. The Explorer is too similar to your Sub.
I think a dressy white dial would be most complimentary; maybe a Datejust or OP. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,758
|
Non of the above.
__________________
E |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: OH
Posts: 712
|
I wouldn’t get either of the listed watches to pair with a 14060m. I would get a 16710.
__________________
Rolex: 114060, 116600, 116610LV, 116660 JC, 116710BLNR, 126710BLRO, 326934 x 2, 16520, 16660 x 2, 16800, 16030 Tudor: BB Pro, Pelagos LHD, P01 VC: 4500v |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: Essex, UK
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 2,943
|
Agreed
Perfect pair
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,908
|
LV but I am biased. Love everything about this reference.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Asia
Watch: 5-digit steel
Posts: 384
|
If you have to get an LV I would suggest the 116610LV. Rolex have gone backwards with the 12-LV.
__________________
♛ Submariner 14060m, 2-line ♛ Explorer II 16570, polar ♛ Cosmograph Daytona 16520, white dial |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 48,829
|
The LV.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: AJ
Location: USA
Watch: Swiss
Posts: 5,253
|
Neither. I’d take a GMT BLRO.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,110
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Submarine
Posts: 376
|
Just for context, it's between the two options (Explorer and Kermit) only because those are the only watches that I currently have interest in-- I know very vanilla of me.
I’ve been living vicariously through the 124270 Explorer owners on YouTube and RF. The Explorer drew my attention after its update going back to its roots in a 36mm case. I thought it would sort of make sense to complete my two watch collection, land and sea. Just this past week I walked in to my local AD and tried it on wrist. Needless to say it looks right at home on my below average sized wrist! ![]() I've always wanted the hulk, but with prices where they are it isn't really feasible to obtain anymore, for me at least. Next best would be the kermit, though i've never tried one on, i'm imagining that it may be too large at 41mm on my 6" wrist. The Submariner is my favorite Rolex model, and though it may seem redundant to own a pair of subs, I thought it would be cool to have an updated model with ceramic bezel, better bracelet, etc. What I really hope for is that Rolex would consider sizing the Submariner back down to 40mm and bring the hulk back someday. One can only wish! In conclusion, maybe i'll get the Explorer if and when I receive the call. Then wait for a kermit or hulk in the future ;) then i'll complete my 3 watch collection until another one I like comes along :) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Dubai
Posts: 1,450
|
16710 for sure
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Aus
Posts: 444
|
Based on how the 124270 looks to wear on you, I’d hazard a guess that the 6-digit subs will feel too big on your wrist.
I have the 14060m, 124270 and 124273. There is quite a bit of overlap between the Sub and the Exp. I find myself reaching out more for the Exp these days for its stealth and improved legibility. I think this will be even more pertinent in your case as the 124270 fits small wrists much better than the 14060m. In closing, in your shoes, if I had to choose between the Exp and LV, I’d go for the Exp as I think that’ll wear better. Don’t be surprised if you end up finding the Exp suits better than even the 14060m. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.