ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

hutch300 · 14 October 2022, 02:35 AM

I just picked up an awesome 1991 X serial SD and love it and the fit is great, however, it is missing the notched link for dive extension. I need part C from this image. I am curious if anyone knows if Rolex still sells these or has one? I know the later years used a more J style and I don't know if those are also compatible. Any ideas or help would be appreciated.

hutch300 · 14 October 2022, 06:33 AM

Problem solved by a great AD!

Haywood_Milton · 14 October 2022, 06:34 AM

Your catalogue images show the 93160A bracelet with solid end links and later style extension parts.

This was not fitted to watches as early as yours.

sah · 14 October 2022, 03:17 PM

My 1993 has solid end links. I think the Sea Dwellers got them long before other models like the submariner. Maybe as early as the 1970s?

Haywood_Milton · 14 October 2022, 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sah

My 1993 has solid end links. I think the Sea Dwellers got them long before other models like the submariner. Maybe as early as the 1970s?

I think you’re right on the ELs from when the 93160 was introduced; sorry, brain-fart !

H

padi56 · 14 October 2022, 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sah

My 1993 has solid end links. I think the Sea Dwellers got them long before other models like the submariner. Maybe as early as the 1970s?

Correct the SD has always had a SEL ever since introduction.

brandrea · 14 October 2022, 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by padi56

Correct the SD has always had a SEL ever since introduction.

Good to know Peter.

I had one (my first Rolex) back in 92 or so. I sure wish I hadn’t have sold it on.

hutch300 · 15 October 2022, 01:59 AM

These 16600's are great value. You get a lot for the money and while larger than a 16610 its a similar wear to a maxi case sub.

Filipão · 15 October 2022, 08:58 AM

The 16600 is the best Rolex ever.

harry in montreal · 15 October 2022, 01:25 PM

M’y 16600 was bought New at Tourneau on Worth Ave in wpb FL in 2005 for 4700. The 16610 was 4200 and the 14010 was 3750. Ima old fart

Eric88 · 15 October 2022, 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by padi56

Correct the SD has always had a SEL ever since introduction.

True for the five digit SD. Prior to this it was the non SEL for the four digit SD as far as I know.

14 October 2022, 02:35 AM	#1
hutch300 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Real Name: Jeff Location: PNW Posts: 1,481	16600 Sea-Dweller 93160 Bracelet Question I just picked up an awesome 1991 X serial SD and love it and the fit is great, however, it is missing the notched link for dive extension. I need part C from this image. I am curious if anyone knows if Rolex still sells these or has one? I know the later years used a more J style and I don't know if those are also compatible. Any ideas or help would be appreciated.

14 October 2022, 06:34 AM	#3
Haywood_Milton "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: Yes, it is ! Location: Cheshire & Mersey Watch: Military issue Sub Posts: 1,330	Your catalogue images show the 93160A bracelet with solid end links and later style extension parts. This was not fitted to watches as early as yours. __________________ Comex:5513,5514,1665x2,16800x2,16600 Mil sub:5517x2,5513x9,5512 Submariner:6536/1x2,5508,5513 PCG u/line & double SWISS (America's Cup),5513 giltx2, 5513 m-firstx2,5513 gloss WGx2,1680 Red,1680 White Mk1 & Mk2 Sea-Dweller:1665 DRSDx3,Great Whitex3 GMT-Master:6542x2 (1 Bakelite),1675x8 (2 gilt), 16750 & SeaKing 116710LN Explorer:1016x6 (1 gilt),5500x3,14270 Blackout, Orange 1655 x4 Milgauss 1019x3 Cosmo 6263 *RNCD DSSD 116660.

14 October 2022, 06:33 AM	#2
hutch300 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Real Name: Jeff Location: PNW Posts: 1,481	Problem solved by a great AD!

14 October 2022, 03:17 PM	#4
sah "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2014 Real Name: Scott Location: Placerville, Ca Watch: Creamsicle, JLC Posts: 490	My 1993 has solid end links. I think the Sea Dwellers got them long before other models like the submariner. Maybe as early as the 1970s?

15 October 2022, 01:59 AM	#8
hutch300 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Real Name: Jeff Location: PNW Posts: 1,481	These 16600's are great value. You get a lot for the money and while larger than a 16610 its a similar wear to a maxi case sub.

15 October 2022, 08:58 AM	#9
Filipão "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2018 Real Name: Filipe Location: Lisbon & Wadesdah Watch: Never too many Posts: 1,898	The 16600 is the best Rolex ever.

15 October 2022, 01:25 PM	#10
harry in montreal "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Montreal Watch: The Habs pick 1st! Posts: 3,589	M’y 16600 was bought New at Tourneau on Worth Ave in wpb FL in 2005 for 4700. The 16610 was 4200 and the 14010 was 3750. Ima old fart

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)