ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

barber · 27 July 2009, 03:37 PM

I was wonering if these datejusts are real or not. Thanks for any info you all can give.

Name: rolex1.jpg
Views: 88
Size: 48.4 KB

Attachment 78254

Attachment 78262

onkyo · 27 July 2009, 03:43 PM

bigger?

barber · 27 July 2009, 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onkyo

bigger?

Ya sorry I just got done editing my OP asking how to make them bigger

onkyo · 27 July 2009, 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by barber

Ya sorry I just got done editing my OP asking how to make them bigger

No problemo ... take your time barber.

We aren't going anywhere.....

idk01 · 27 July 2009, 03:52 PM

Was expecting to see a completely different picture here

onkyo · 27 July 2009, 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by idk01

Was expecting to see a completely different picture here

Wrong forum Dave....

idk01 · 27 July 2009, 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onkyo

Wrong forum Dave....

Thats what they all say

barber · 27 July 2009, 04:24 PM

How about that is that better?

idk01 · 27 July 2009, 07:49 PM

Cheers, much better

The datejust on the left looks all wrong from the font on the dial, The gold on the president bracelet looks like its wearing off on the edges, the date font looks wrong and the date magnification is off too, do you have any more info or pics.

The one on the right is a hard call, looks ok from that photo, looks like an older acrylic crystal and the date font looks maybe a little too bold. do you have any ref numbers or model/serials on these?

Cheers,

Dave.

onkyo · 27 July 2009, 10:39 PM

As Dave said.....

The Rolex crown on the right dial also looks suspicious and the font is off.

Do you have more pics of caseback, bands, serial/model, mov't etc? That would help a lot.

mcjp6 · 27 July 2009, 11:18 PM

The watch on the left is fake.

The minute and second hands are too short, the tritium markers are too far away from the sticks/plots, the dial printing is all wrong, spacing is out, 29 and 31 sec markers wrong etc.

barber · 28 July 2009, 01:38 AM

Thanks everyone. Well the I figured the one on the left was fake. The one on the right, I don't have any numbers for it other than it's a model 1601. I saw a picture of the movement but it wasn't a great picture. It looks like a real movement buy the colors and color of the writing. The inside of the case back is stamped correctly and everything.

27 July 2009, 03:37 PM	#1
barber Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Mike Location: reno Watch: TT DJ Posts: 84	Are these REAL? Updated pictures I was wonering if these datejusts are real or not. Thanks for any info you all can give. Attachment 78254 Attachment 78262

27 July 2009, 03:52 PM	#5
idk01 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Dave Location: Australia Watch: DJ16233TT Posts: 18,485	Was expecting to see a completely different picture here __________________ *Apprentice to Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth*

27 July 2009, 07:49 PM	#9
idk01 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Dave Location: Australia Watch: DJ16233TT Posts: 18,485	Cheers, much better The datejust on the left looks all wrong from the font on the dial, The gold on the president bracelet looks like its wearing off on the edges, the date font looks wrong and the date magnification is off too, do you have any more info or pics. The one on the right is a hard call, looks ok from that photo, looks like an older acrylic crystal and the date font looks maybe a little too bold. do you have any ref numbers or model/serials on these? Cheers, Dave. __________________ *Apprentice to Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth*

27 July 2009, 03:43 PM	#2
onkyo Banned Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Pav Location: Manhattan Posts: 11,495	bigger?

27 July 2009, 04:24 PM	#8
barber Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Mike Location: reno Watch: TT DJ Posts: 84	How about that is that better?

27 July 2009, 10:39 PM	#10
onkyo Banned Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Pav Location: Manhattan Posts: 11,495	As Dave said..... The Rolex crown on the right dial also looks suspicious and the font is off. Do you have more pics of caseback, bands, serial/model, mov't etc? That would help a lot.

27 July 2009, 11:18 PM	#11
mcjp6 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Michael Location: VK2 - AUS Watch: 5513s Posts: 7,380	The watch on the left is fake. The minute and second hands are too short, the tritium markers are too far away from the sticks/plots, the dial printing is all wrong, spacing is out, 29 and 31 sec markers wrong etc.

28 July 2009, 01:38 AM	#12
barber Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Mike Location: reno Watch: TT DJ Posts: 84	Thanks everyone. Well the I figured the one on the left was fake. The one on the right, I don't have any numbers for it other than it's a model 1601. I saw a picture of the movement but it wasn't a great picture. It looks like a real movement buy the colors and color of the writing. The inside of the case back is stamped correctly and everything.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)