![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Geneva
Posts: 68
|
26715OR or 16202st
I love both equally and currently being offered both at 65k so curious which of these two is most likely a better long term hold? I know some will say ‘buy what you love’ but in this case, I love both so now it comes down to which is a safer place to park the money. I know none of us have a magic crystal ball but hoping to get some insight from experienced folks on here.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2022
Location: USA
Posts: 283
|
I wouldn't think anything modern is necessarily safe.
__________________
15510ST Green | 15720ST Gray | 26393QT Taupe | 116400GV | 126234 Mint |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: NY
Posts: 143
|
Long term hold, that might mean for value or for a watch you will truly hold onto and wear forever. If you are looking for an investment (you should not!) that would likely be the 16202st. You will always lose with gold imho.
Now if you are talking about strictly wearing/enjoy the watches- this is my personal opinion, but for the money the rose ROC seems like the better buy. The 16202st is a somewhat new model, super scarce, but not a true legend (yet) like the 15202 was Again just personal, but I find the 26315 to fit better than the 15202 I tried (I know older versions of both of your options!) but that is totally up to you. Not to mention you can also switch up the look of the ROC by throwing it on a strap |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/AP/PP/ALS
Posts: 6,009
|
Wow, 26715OR Bleu Nuit dial at $65k seems like a good price and gorgeous timepiece. I would love to have that.
If you don't take it, who is your secondary market dealer, please let me know. Best way go for 16202OR.
__________________
Rolex: 116621, 126333, 126711CHNR, 114060, 116500LN White, 126660 JC, 126710BLNR, 126710BLRO, 116610LV, 126610LN, 126610LV, 116508 YG Green Dial, 124300 Turquoise, 126719BLRO Meteorite dial, 228235 Olive dial ,126755SARU, 116505 RG Black dial, 326934 Blue Sky D. AP: 15451ST Blue, 15500OR w/Bracelet, 14790SA, 14790BA, 26022BC(Salmon) PP: 5524R, 5712G, ALS: Time Zone 136.032, Cartier: WGSA0030, WSSA0061, YG Oct. 2965, Carree 2961, YG Carree, Tank W5000156 Breguet: 7137BA, MontBlanc: 109996" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Real Name: Chris
Location: Germany
Posts: 667
|
I'd think 26715or should hold better value given it's closer to the retail price and is full gold./
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 2,429
|
I’d go 16202
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: B.
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 3,677
|
What else is in your collection? The 16202st will be more versatile than a RG that may not always be appropriate and certainly more flashy. Do you have any other AP in your collection? If not, IMO, a RO in steel on bracelet is a great place to start. The ROC is without question the better value being a PM.
Or buy both :) They certainly compliment each other. 38MM ROC and 39MM jumbo, IMO, is the perfect 2 piece AP collection.
__________________
Richard Mille RG RM030 || Richard Mille RM72ti || AP 26240 50TH Green Royal Oak Chrono || AP Royal Oak Off Shore Gulf Blue 26238 || AP Royal Oak Blue JUMBO SS 15202ST || AP ROO Diver Green 15720ST || ♕ Rolex Platinum Daytona Diamond 116506 || Cartier Santos |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Geneva
Posts: 68
|
Quote:
I think the 16202 is a better choice since it’ll be my only AP |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,249
|
between the two that 16202 is definitely a better choice since it's an iconic design
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: NY
Posts: 143
|
I still think the 26715or might be your best bet if you do not have any other chronos or gold pieces. It is so darn unique, and rose with blue dial is something I would NEVER turn down. The 16202 is still amazing though, but we are talking same money for either, I rather a gold piece. That is just me though.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 2,573
|
Would you rather wear a stainless Daytona or a gold sub?
I think the jumbo will be the safer bet for your money. But I’d rather wear the full gold banger myself. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: US
Posts: 109
|
16202 best AP around
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Houston
Watch: AP 26240st,26420ce
Posts: 255
|
26715or is my vote - I personally love having a chrono and use it every day. I also like to see movement on my watch (active seconds hand, even if it’s a small seconds hand at 6 o’clock). The 16202 is iconic though, so you can’t go wrong either way!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: B.
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 3,677
|
Spot on, if I had to have only one AP it would be a jumbo, no questions asked.
__________________
Richard Mille RG RM030 || Richard Mille RM72ti || AP 26240 50TH Green Royal Oak Chrono || AP Royal Oak Off Shore Gulf Blue 26238 || AP Royal Oak Blue JUMBO SS 15202ST || AP ROO Diver Green 15720ST || ♕ Rolex Platinum Daytona Diamond 116506 || Cartier Santos |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.