ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

mcjp6 · 17 September 2009, 01:17 PM

Which watch would you buy? I am wrestling with a decision and would appreciate some intelligent input.

A white submariner 1680 5 m serial with last years RSC service papers or a 2000 GMT Master II. 16710 with all boxs, tags, papers etc. Both watches in excellent condition and both priced around US5300.

I would really appreciate your vote/comments as to which one and why.

TurboWatch · 17 September 2009, 01:19 PM

provided that it is original

newmedia · 17 September 2009, 01:25 PM

Since I am not into paying a higher priced old watches that anyone can buy pretty much everyday , I would go with newer Rolex thats less than 10 years old, thats just me.

fishrising · 17 September 2009, 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcjp6

Which watch would you buy?

If I had to buy one, I would buy the white 1680 because I already have a GMTII from around the year 2000.

JRA21 · 18 September 2009, 07:23 AM

I really like the SUB but no papers no deal then again thats just me. ( I voted for the GMT II )

DRAWTOOL · 18 September 2009, 07:33 AM

White Sub, I like Subs better'n GMTs.

DadsWatch72 · 18 September 2009, 07:47 AM

Hard choice. Both have papers that verify them being genuine so either one is a good choice. I am starting to like the 24 hour hand.

The GMT Master · 18 September 2009, 08:31 AM

I'd go for the GMT, mainly for peace of mind over servicing in the long term.

Perdu · 18 September 2009, 08:33 AM

I'd go with the vintage Sub.

STEELINOX · 18 September 2009, 08:37 AM

if they're both priced in around $5300, then its a tad high for the current market, esp for the GMT IMHO ...
Or is it BOTH for $5300 and not each??

greekbum · 18 September 2009, 08:37 AM

$5300.00 usd for a 16710 is very high dont you think? For even money I would take the sub any day.But they are 2 different watches and you will have 2 be the judge.

BGRINDEL · 18 September 2009, 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by greekbum

$5300.00 usd for a 16710 is very high dont you think? For even money I would take the sub any day.But they are 2 different watches and you will have 2 be the judge.

That's exactly what I was thinking, really high for the GMT. Should be around $4-4.5K usd.

I voted for the sub!

mike · 18 September 2009, 08:49 AM

While I'm a diehard GMT fan, the 1680 is a special reference and would be my choice. The tall crystal is such a unique feature.

swatty · 18 September 2009, 03:07 PM

1680 will keep your Sub collection increasing

Gaijin · 18 September 2009, 03:10 PM

What's a White Sub?

Colnago · 18 September 2009, 03:45 PM

Tritium markers are very white.....as far as I know that's what it means.....sure others will chirp up

sakuraba · 18 September 2009, 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colnago

Tritium markers are very white.....as far as I know that's what it means.....sure others will chirp up

I thought it was because the lettering for "Submariner" is in white as opposed to the Red Sub which has it in red. Now I'm not so sure.

Colnago · 18 September 2009, 03:54 PM

Hey maybe you are right...I'm no expert.....I just read it on a quick Yahoo search for "rolex 1680 white".....

Colnago · 18 September 2009, 04:00 PM

Now I am sure you are right....I probably look like an idiot now for jumping in with both feet.....I definitely feel like one....sorry everyone....I should not have commented.....

mcjp6 · 18 September 2009, 04:16 PM

Thanks to all for your comments. yes the GMT is expensive but it is here in Australia and in mint condition would explain that. I guess I always knew I wanted the 1680 but you know how it is, before you commit you always look at all angles, and its always interesting to read the different comments from all here. Always room to learn.

So I purchased the 1680 around an hour ago... and all things going well I should have it by this time next week. Now all I have to do is wait....

swatty · 18 September 2009, 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcjp6

Thanks to all for your comments. yes the GMT is expensive but it is here in Australia and in mint condition would explain that. I guess I always knew I wanted the 1680 but you know how it is, before you commit you always look at all angles, and its always interesting to read the different comments from all here. Always room to learn.

So I purchased the 1680 around an hour ago... and all things going well I should have it by this time next week. Now all I have to do is wait....

And the wait begins , Congrats mate , can't wait to see the pics

derekloimer · 18 September 2009, 08:16 PM

Michael,

I hope you enjoy the 1680 and are not missing the Explorer too much

mcjp6 · 18 September 2009, 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by derekloimer

Michael,

I hope you enjoy the 1680 and are not missing the Explorer too much

Already missing it!! But I seem to be on the vintage sub route right now, anyway I can know its gone to a good "home"...

mcjp6 · 18 September 2009, 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swatty

And the wait begins , Congrats mate , can't wait to see the pics

I'll have a whole new set for the next GTG Peter! How about your new addition?

TempoKing · 18 September 2009, 08:42 PM

If the question was about the 1680 Sub and the 1675 GMT then I would
really go into deep thinking, but between the 1680 and the 16710..???
I do not have to even think twice about it...1680... 1000%

swatty · 18 September 2009, 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcjp6

I'll have a whole new set for the next GTG Peter! How about your new addition?

Still waiting, just missed out on the last one I was looking at

mldaytona · 18 September 2009, 09:07 PM

I'd buy both.

View Poll Results: Which watch would you buy?
1680 Submariner 1975	36	52.94%
16710 GMT Master II 2000	32	47.06%
Voters: 68. You may not vote on this poll

17 September 2009, 01:17 PM	#1
mcjp6 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Michael Location: VK2 - AUS Watch: 5513s Posts: 7,380	Which would you buy? Which watch would you buy? I am wrestling with a decision and would appreciate some intelligent input. A white submariner 1680 5 m serial with last years RSC service papers or a 2000 GMT Master II. 16710 with all boxs, tags, papers etc. Both watches in excellent condition and both priced around US5300. I would really appreciate your vote/comments as to which one and why.

17 September 2009, 01:19 PM	#2
TurboWatch "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: NorCal Posts: 1,641	white 1680 any day of the week provided that it is original

18 September 2009, 07:23 AM	#5
JRA21 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Joshua R Asch Location: NY, Brooklyn Watch: Sub Posts: 293	I really like the SUB but no papers no deal then again thats just me. ( I voted for the GMT II ) __________________ *JRA*

18 September 2009, 08:33 AM	#9
Perdu "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Gary Location: GMT-6 Watch: GMT Posts: 3,350	I'd go with the vintage Sub. __________________ Omega Seamaster 300M GMT Noire Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 8500 Benson 1937 Sterling Silver Hunter

17 September 2009, 01:25 PM	#3
newmedia "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: Austin Posts: 526	Since I am not into paying a higher priced old watches that anyone can buy pretty much everyday , I would go with newer Rolex thats less than 10 years old, thats just me.

18 September 2009, 07:33 AM	#6
DRAWTOOL "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Mikey Uí Néill Location: Olden Texas Watch: 14060M & 16570 Posts: 1,941	White Sub, I like Subs better'n GMTs.

18 September 2009, 07:47 AM	#7
DadsWatch72 Banned Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: USA Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX Posts: 2,401	Hard choice. Both have papers that verify them being genuine so either one is a good choice. I am starting to like the 24 hour hand.

18 September 2009, 08:31 AM	#8
The GMT Master "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Chris Location: England Posts: 8,150	I'd go for the GMT, mainly for peace of mind over servicing in the long term.

18 September 2009, 08:37 AM	#10
STEELINOX 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Real Name: Sink-O! Location: a praire in AZ Watch: ROLEX-less atm... Posts: 14,020	if they're both priced in around $5300, then its a tad high for the current market, esp for the GMT IMHO ... Or is it BOTH for $5300 and not each??

18 September 2009, 08:37 AM	#11
greekbum "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Nikos Location: Florida Watch: Rolex GMT 16750 Posts: 8,418	$5300.00 usd for a 16710 is very high dont you think? For even money I would take the sub any day.But they are 2 different watches and you will have 2 be the judge. __________________ Follow Me On Instagram @nickgogas Original Owner ROLEX 16750 GMT Daily Wearer For Over 13,000 Days And Counting

18 September 2009, 08:49 AM	#13
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	While I'm a diehard GMT fan, the 1680 is a special reference and would be my choice. The tall crystal is such a unique feature.

18 September 2009, 03:07 PM	#14
swatty 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Peter Location: Sydney Watch: The Game Posts: 17,415	1680 will keep your Sub collection increasing

18 September 2009, 03:10 PM	#15
Gaijin 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Japan Watch: ing your back. Posts: 16,179	What's a White Sub?

18 September 2009, 03:45 PM	#16
Colnago "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Bill Hart Location: Richmond, NY, UK Watch: Rlx=3, Tdr=3, Om=3 Posts: 3,053	Tritium markers are very white.....as far as I know that's what it means.....sure others will chirp up __________________ Bill "There's only three kinds of people in this world....those that can count....and those that can't" TRF's "JJ's" Bar & NightClub Patron

18 September 2009, 03:54 PM	#18
Colnago "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Bill Hart Location: Richmond, NY, UK Watch: Rlx=3, Tdr=3, Om=3 Posts: 3,053	Hey maybe you are right...I'm no expert.....I just read it on a quick Yahoo search for "rolex 1680 white"..... __________________ Bill "There's only three kinds of people in this world....those that can count....and those that can't" TRF's "JJ's" Bar & NightClub Patron

18 September 2009, 04:00 PM	#19
Colnago "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Bill Hart Location: Richmond, NY, UK Watch: Rlx=3, Tdr=3, Om=3 Posts: 3,053	Now I am sure you are right....I probably look like an idiot now for jumping in with both feet.....I definitely feel like one....sorry everyone....I should not have commented..... __________________ Bill "There's only three kinds of people in this world....those that can count....and those that can't" TRF's "JJ's" Bar & NightClub Patron

18 September 2009, 04:16 PM	#20
mcjp6 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Michael Location: VK2 - AUS Watch: 5513s Posts: 7,380	Thanks to all for your comments. yes the GMT is expensive but it is here in Australia and in mint condition would explain that. I guess I always knew I wanted the 1680 but you know how it is, before you commit you always look at all angles, and its always interesting to read the different comments from all here. Always room to learn. So I purchased the 1680 around an hour ago... and all things going well I should have it by this time next week. Now all I have to do is wait....

18 September 2009, 08:16 PM	#22
derekloimer Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Derek Lorimer Location: Canberra Posts: 77	Michael, I hope you enjoy the 1680 and are not missing the Explorer too much

18 September 2009, 08:42 PM	#25
TempoKing Banned Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Anastasios Location: Athens Greece Watch: Rolex GMT 1675 Posts: 8,497	If the question was about the 1680 Sub and the 1675 GMT then I would really go into deep thinking, but between the 1680 and the 16710..??? I do not have to even think twice about it...1680... 1000%

18 September 2009, 09:07 PM	#27
mldaytona "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Real Name: Michael Location: USA Watch: me go all out Posts: 1,183	I'd buy both.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)