![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Aspen
Posts: 893
|
Is "The Beast" second most iconic AP?
For those of you with large enough wrist to wear it comfortably....I am curious on of everyone's current thoughts on The Beast (26238).
The 26238Ti was one of the first APs I tried on at a boutique, but at the time, I quickly dismissed it due to its thickness. I quickly fell in love with the current 43mm line, but have been waiting and waiting for a ghost re-issue. It is starting to feel as though that will not happen in the short term and while I have purchased my wife a RO, my adventure is still waiting to start. For a while, I thought maybe I would just buy a khaki 43 this year, but now I am thinking more and more about the 26238Ti. With the quick change strap, there is a lot of versatility there. Black, grey or white rubber...a custom textile strap like the grey on the RG 26420, which I think would look pretty killer. Plus, other than the Jumbo...The Beast seems like the second most iconic AP. I really want a titanium ROO, eventually a blue dial Jumbo and a ceramic 41. Feels like the beast is a great place to start. What says the collective? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Steve
Location: Indiana
Watch: PP/AP/VC
Posts: 2,177
|
I think so. I'm not very knowledgeable about AP's history, but would have to think that the launch of The Beast in 1993 ushered in a whole new style of large/oversized watches.
Even though I have about a 6.5" wrist, I love my 26420SO for weekend and casual wear. The ceramic bezel protects the case and mine really looks unworn. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2023
Location: Europe
Posts: 284
|
I tend to agree. In the past, I had always said to myself that I’m not an Offshore guy. But I must admit the Beast has grown on me. It is after all the watch that saved AP in a way.
Gesendet von iPad mit Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Aspen
Posts: 893
|
I understand it is a big watch, but I really think the quick change strap has made the beast much more versatile and easier to wear.
There is not any difference between the current 42mm ROO in light blue/green then the beast when on the rubber strap. I tried the light blue on at the boutique and it feels good on wrist...although I do wish it was 14mm tall...lol. I did not get to try on the green Ti model...but I have to guess it feels even more manageable for wearing all day. This won't be a popular opinion...but some of the past 44 ROO models have not aged as well to my eye, and while I do love the current 43, it feels as though the beast has a better chance of staying attractive to me. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: USA
Posts: 919
|
Saw this thread last night and after thinking about it, I think you’re right and the beast is probably #2.
Obviously someone can be super technical and say it’s 5402, then 15202, etc. But the beast probably had more relevance than the RO did at launch. Perhaps older folks here could describe how the beast (at the height of ROO popularity) compared to the RO in present day. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SNA
Posts: 3,646
|
Love my 26238Ti
Love the color of Ti, the weight, the bracelet. The quick change system is so convenient. The case is thick, but so is the bracelet, so balances out nicely. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Aspen
Posts: 893
|
Thank you for sharing the pics. It looks great!
Do you also have a deep sea? If so, which reference and how do they compare? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: North East
Posts: 255
|
![]() Great watch I love mine. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Gareth
Location: Surrey, UK
Watch: AP/Rolex
Posts: 2,326
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Aspen
Posts: 893
|
How is the weight of the SS? I imagine having the option to put on rubber with the quick change makes a huge difference when you don’t want something heavy.
Hard to decide between the Ti and SS…but I am currently thinking Ti. Quick note….unless Rmoor did the conversion, his watch wouldn’t have the quick change strap. Running seconds is at 12. I would love to see the Ti with a grey rubber strap or an orange strap (textile or rubber). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 2,572
|
These are very cool! Weren’t on my radar.
I liked the ceramic one A LOT but I remember a forum member here getting one and then letting it go pretty quick so I kinda took that as a sign to skip it and never thought about them again. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Aspen
Posts: 893
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 2,572
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Aspen
Posts: 893
|
Quote:
Another detail that I really like about the beast…the hands and petite tapisserie from the Jumbo. More than any of the other models, the beast and jumbo have these items tying them together. The white date disc on the blue dial beast is a cool throwback as well. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SNA
Posts: 3,646
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SNA
Posts: 3,646
|
Quote:
On my previous 44mm ROO and Diver, the large blocks were a bit plain. Nice to see detailed work on the 43mm ROO mega blocks. I also like the classic shaped hands of the Jumbo and 26238 (along with dial markers that are consistent). And I prefer the main hand design of the 44mm 26400 models vs the 43mm 26420. The 26420 main hands are a bit leafy shaped to me, and I don't like the bisected lume of the main hour hand. Initially, I wanted a 43mm 26420 as a successor to my previous 44mm 26400, but the 26238 bracelet, petite tapisserie, classic ROO chrono subdial arrangement, and having both the AP logo and print on the dial won out. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Aspen
Posts: 893
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: USA
Posts: 2,698
|
Quote:
I got the SS as it is the one which is as close to the original one with tbe blue dial. A friend got the Ti version and he is regretting not getting the SS due to the blue dial. But of course it is a personal choice. But since you seems to be wanting an iconic piece with the history, it may play as a factor. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Aspen
Posts: 893
|
Quote:
1. I love AP titanium and my grail is a titanium 41mm perpetual, which I have had the chance to wear for a couple minutes and still love it. 2. I have been waiting and waiting for a reissue of the ghost in 43mm and the Ti beast is as close to that as I think you can get from the modern catalogue. I wear a lot of blues, greens, browns, tans, greys and black....the grey dial feels much more versatile with strap options (I think it could look great with bracelet, black rubber, grey, orange and potentially white). Also, I prefer a light watch, am very active, dress very casual and worry I would not enjoy the SS on wrist as much. Also, I want a Jumbo some day to scratch the blue dial itch...or a QP. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: USA
Posts: 2,698
|
Quote:
![]() I think you answered your own question already. No bad choice here; just personal preference |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,928
|
I’d say so. The impact it had in the early 90s up until now on the oversized sports watch in haute horology is unprecedented. People have to remember that the Krey several decades ago was for the offshore and the Royal Oak was the dog of the collection.
__________________
AP 15500ST (Silver) // ♛ Rolex 126334 (Blue Roman, Fluted, Jubilee) // Ω Moonswatch (Mission to Pluto) // G-Shock GA2100-1A1 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Aspen
Posts: 893
|
If you have the wrist for it…offshore’s have to be the top dog of large watches (along with RM if that is in your realm).
I know small watches are all the rage, but as long as it is proportional, I can’t help but think big watches will make a comeback soon and for one simple reason…. What is the current most popular wrist “watch” in the world and what size is it? If half the population are wearing larger Apple Watches, people are going to become used to that size (both wearing it and visually seeing it on other people). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.