ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

sambb · 31 December 2009, 04:40 AM

could someone PLEASE post a pic of a 320 or other 3XX PAM with a SUB or a SEA DWELLER? I need to see the size as it compares, as I have a small wrist.

A1000 · 31 December 2009, 05:18 AM

Hope this helps, a 312 with a sub LV.

B. Doggy · 31 December 2009, 05:18 AM

Sweeeeeet!!

dotcomakazee · 31 December 2009, 05:48 AM

mrh1797 · 31 December 2009, 06:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sambb

could someone PLEASE post a pic of a 320 or other 3XX PAM with a SUB or a SEA DWELLER? I need to see the size as it compares, as I have a small wrist.

Here is PAM 320, DSSD, and Sub no date on my wrist!!

Matt

jvo300 · 31 December 2009, 06:56 AM

312 and old Sub

mrh1797 · 31 December 2009, 07:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jvo300

312 and old Sub

SWEET SUB....What year is she???

jvo300 · 31 December 2009, 07:24 AM

She's a 1680 from about 1977!

mrh1797 · 31 December 2009, 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jvo300

she's a 1680 from about 1977!

bad a$$!!!!!!!

Fred_Tan · 31 December 2009, 09:14 AM

l luv all your twins & triplets here!

sambb · 31 December 2009, 09:30 AM

gosh it is pretty large, maybe too big for my wrist since it seems bigger than the dssd

jvo300 · 31 December 2009, 11:51 AM

44mm and 1950 case is monstrous on small wrists. I have a 6.5 inch wrist and had the hardest time getting past the size at first. I just bit the bullet earlier this year and it's grown on me ever since. The 312 is a new one for me and I feel like 44mm is now the perfect size! It's a matter of personal preference.

sambb · 31 December 2009, 12:05 PM

is a 42mm radiomir and option instead and what would you recc for a GMT?

jvo300 · 31 December 2009, 12:21 PM

This is just my opinion, but Ive read it many times before from others when I was researching my first PAM purchase ... I would not recommend getting anything below 44mm as the size will grow on you and you will likely upgrade to the larger size if you start small. The size is one of the hallmarks of this watch line.

Having said that I will admit that this is not an everyday watch for me. I find it impractical as a dressy watch for work because I have small wrists and do not want to have shirts custom made just so I can drag around the brick on my wrist. It is a spectacular casual watch though!! I'm sure others will jump in with opinions/pictures of PAMs and suits to give you another perspective.

ocwatching · 31 December 2009, 01:17 PM

the 1950 case wears nicely on my 6.6" wrist...it will grow on ya...
and with the brand..yes...44mm is a hallmark and iconic...

you really gotta try one on...I looked at TONS of wrist shots..but had to try it on to see

dukerules · 31 December 2009, 10:57 PM

A 44mm PAM will wear MUCH bigger than a 39.5mm Rolex Sub or SD. My 312 wears much bigger than the other two 44mm diver watches I own. Big is good in this case. They are supposed to wear big. I think a large PAM looks perfectly at home on a small wrist, as there is no pretense of it being anything other than a large, noticeable watch. PAMs look big even on big wrists.

TswaneNguni · 31 December 2009, 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sambb

gosh it is pretty large, maybe too big for my wrist since it seems bigger than the dssd

The are big, but wear flat and comfy.When you are used to PAM,anything else never feels quite right again.

A1000 · 31 December 2009, 11:11 PM

x2 I agree, whilst the PAM wears big due to the fact that it has a relatively small and simple bezel the aesthetic effect is that it looks balanced. If it had a contrasting coloured bezel with numbers on it then it would probably look significantly larger.

I was worried about the size and my first try on almost turned me away as it felt significantly big on my 7" wrist. When I tried it on for a second time it felt much more normal and now I just love it. I pretty much have my PAM for "home" days and my sub LV for "work" days.

Psmith · 3 January 2010, 07:04 PM

Rads tend to be either 45 or 47mm. The 244 is a 40mm Luminor GMT (similar design to the 44mm 88)

Quote:

Originally Posted by sambb

is a 42mm radiomir and option instead and what would you recc for a GMT?

31 December 2009, 04:40 AM	#1
sambb "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: USA/UK Posts: 1,382	320 (or other 3xx PAM) + Rolex Pic request could someone PLEASE post a pic of a 320 or other 3XX PAM with a SUB or a SEA DWELLER? I need to see the size as it compares, as I have a small wrist.

31 December 2009, 05:18 AM	#2
A1000 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Adrian Location: UK Posts: 953	Hope this helps, a 312 with a sub LV. Attached Images __________________ Rolex 16610LV (2007) PAM 312K (2009) PAM 292K (2009)

31 December 2009, 05:18 AM	#3
B. Doggy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Oregon Posts: 7,399	Sweeeeeet!! __________________ Rolex / Panerai / Omega

31 December 2009, 05:48 AM	#4
dotcomakazee "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: Ty Location: Irving, TX Watch: Exp II 42mm Posts: 919	Attached Images __________________ Rolex Explorer II 42mm • Panerai 389 47mm

31 December 2009, 09:14 AM	#10
Fred_Tan Banned Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Fred Tan Location: Singapore Watch: Bumble Bee Posts: 668	U guys are BAD l luv all your twins & triplets here!

31 December 2009, 06:56 AM	#6
jvo300 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: TX Posts: 1,897	312 and old Sub

31 December 2009, 07:24 AM	#8
jvo300 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: TX Posts: 1,897	She's a 1680 from about 1977!

31 December 2009, 09:30 AM	#11
sambb "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: USA/UK Posts: 1,382	gosh it is pretty large, maybe too big for my wrist since it seems bigger than the dssd

31 December 2009, 11:51 AM	#12
jvo300 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: TX Posts: 1,897	44mm and 1950 case is monstrous on small wrists. I have a 6.5 inch wrist and had the hardest time getting past the size at first. I just bit the bullet earlier this year and it's grown on me ever since. The 312 is a new one for me and I feel like 44mm is now the perfect size! It's a matter of personal preference.

31 December 2009, 12:05 PM	#13
sambb "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: USA/UK Posts: 1,382	is a 42mm radiomir and option instead and what would you recc for a GMT?

31 December 2009, 12:21 PM	#14
jvo300 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: TX Posts: 1,897	This is just my opinion, but Ive read it many times before from others when I was researching my first PAM purchase ... I would not recommend getting anything below 44mm as the size will grow on you and you will likely upgrade to the larger size if you start small. The size is one of the hallmarks of this watch line. Having said that I will admit that this is not an everyday watch for me. I find it impractical as a dressy watch for work because I have small wrists and do not want to have shirts custom made just so I can drag around the brick on my wrist. It is a spectacular casual watch though!! I'm sure others will jump in with opinions/pictures of PAMs and suits to give you another perspective.

31 December 2009, 01:17 PM	#15
ocwatching "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Phil Location: CA Posts: 5,374	the 1950 case wears nicely on my 6.6" wrist...it will grow on ya... and with the brand..yes...44mm is a hallmark and iconic... you really gotta try one on...I looked at TONS of wrist shots..but had to try it on to see __________________ too much into watches...

31 December 2009, 10:57 PM	#16
dukerules "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: NC, USA Posts: 681	A 44mm PAM will wear MUCH bigger than a 39.5mm Rolex Sub or SD. My 312 wears much bigger than the other two 44mm diver watches I own. Big is good in this case. They are supposed to wear big. I think a large PAM looks perfectly at home on a small wrist, as there is no pretense of it being anything other than a large, noticeable watch. PAMs look big even on big wrists. __________________ Instagram: dukerules

31 December 2009, 11:11 PM	#18
A1000 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Adrian Location: UK Posts: 953	x2 I agree, whilst the PAM wears big due to the fact that it has a relatively small and simple bezel the aesthetic effect is that it looks balanced. If it had a contrasting coloured bezel with numbers on it then it would probably look significantly larger. I was worried about the size and my first try on almost turned me away as it felt significantly big on my 7" wrist. When I tried it on for a second time it felt much more normal and now I just love it. I pretty much have my PAM for "home" days and my sub LV for "work" days. __________________ Rolex 16610LV (2007) PAM 312K (2009) PAM 292K (2009)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)