![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Does your 32xx movement seem to be 100% ok? | |||
Yes, no issues |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1,080 | 69.23% |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) but timekeeping is still fine |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
63 | 4.04% |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) and timekeeping is off (>5 s/d) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
417 | 26.73% |
Voters: 1560. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools
![]() |
Display Modes
![]() |
|
![]() |
#11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,192
|
Quote:
Rolex has historically always adhered to this principal whether it be COSC or the Superlative standard. Actually my experience is that Rolex will usually aim for the best possible accuracy when requested, even in the COSC days they were regulating their Chronometer movements to better the Superlative standard for years. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 139 (0 members and 139 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX